December 2001
Volume 1, Issue 3
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2001
Why is letter identification not scale invariant?
Author Affiliations
  • B. S. Tjan
    Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  • S. T. L. Chung
    School of Optometry, Indiana University, IN, USA
  • G. E. Legge
    Psychology Department, University of Minnesota, MN, USA
Journal of Vision December 2001, Vol.1, 411. doi:10.1167/1.3.411
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      B. S. Tjan, S. T. L. Chung, G. E. Legge; Why is letter identification not scale invariant?. Journal of Vision 2001;1(3):411. doi: 10.1167/1.3.411.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

At ARVO 1997, Majaj, Kurshan, & Pelli used critical-band masking to show that letter identification is not scale invariant. They found that channel frequency grows as the 2/3 power of line-frequency, a unit for measuring target spatial frequency. (Scale invariance would produce a value of 1.) At the same meeting, Chung & Legge presented data on contrast sensitivity for identifying filtered letters of different sizes and reported the same result. It is remarkable that the two groups, one using filtered noise, the other filtered letters, arrived at the same quantitative finding. What is the cause of this lack of scale invariance for letter identification? We measured the foveal contrast sensitivity function (CSF) of a participant in the study of Chung & Legge with sine-wave gratings (as opposed to letters). An ideal observer with this CSF as the front-end followed by additive white noise was used to perform the same letter identification task with filtered letters as in Chung & Legge. We found that the “channel” frequency for the ideal observer grows as the 0.69 power of the target spatial frequency, in excellent agreement with human data. We conclude that the scale dependence of letter identification is due to an interaction between the distribution of letter-identity information across spatial frequencies and the visual system's limit in spatial resolution — not a result of any strategic feature selection by the human observer.

Tjan, B.S., Chung, S.T.L., Legge, G.E.(2001). Why is letter identification not scale invariant? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 1( 3): 411, 411a, http://journalofvision.org/1/3/411/, doi:10.1167/1.3.411. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Supports: NEC Research Institute (Tjan), NIH Grant EY02934 (Legge), and EY12810 (Chung).
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×