November 2002
Volume 2, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   November 2002
Orientation discrimination in foveal and extra-foveal vision: Measuring contrast sensitivity
Author Affiliations
  • Sharon L. Sally
    Concordia University, Canada
  • Rick Gurnsey
    Concordia University, Canada
  • Frederic J.A.M.
    Poirier Queen's University, Canada
Journal of Vision November 2002, Vol.2, 197. doi:10.1167/2.7.197
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sharon L. Sally, Rick Gurnsey, Frederic J.A.M.; Orientation discrimination in foveal and extra-foveal vision: Measuring contrast sensitivity. Journal of Vision 2002;2(7):197. doi: 10.1167/2.7.197.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose. Sensitivity to orientation differences is influenced by stimulus size, eccentricity of stimulus presentation and stimulus contrast. Mäkelä et al. (1993, Vision Research) studied the effects of size and eccentricity on orientation thresholds. They presented stimuli at a fixed high level of contrast and found that the threshold versus size functions obtained at each eccentricity could be collapsed onto a single function by dividing stimulus size at eccentricity E by F=1+E/E2, where E2 was about 1.95. Sally & Gurnsey (2001, ARVO) found that the recovered E2 was essentially unchanged when stimulus contrast was eliminated as a potential source of variability. Recently, Melmoth et al. (2000, IOVS) demonstrated that size and contrast make different contributions to form discrimination thresholds as a function of eccentricity, and proposed a method to recover these two eccentricity-dependent limitations. The purpose of the present study is to compare previous estimates of E2 for orientation discrimination with estimates obtained using the Melmoth et al. technique.

Method. Stimuli were vertical and tilted (1.5°) lines displayed on a high-resolution monitor. Contrast sensitivities were measured for identification of the tilted target as a function of size (0.75°–24°) across eccentricities (E = 0°, 2.5°, 5° and 10°).

Results. As stimulus size was increased, contrast sensitivities reached the same asymptotic level at each eccentricity. Scaling stimulus size with an E2 of 3.49° provided the best fit to the data.

Conclusions. In this experiment only size limited performance and there was no need to “double-scale” the data. It is possible, however, that contrast scaling may be required for a more challenging orientation discrimination task (e.g., a smaller orientation difference).

Sally, S. L., Gurnsey, R., Poirier, F. J. A. M.(2002). Orientation discrimination in foveal and extra-foveal vision: Measuring contrast sensitivity [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2( 7): 197, 197a, http://journalofvision.org/2/7/197/, doi:10.1167/2.7.197. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Supported by NSERC and FCAR grants to R. Gurnsey.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×