November 2002
Volume 2, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   November 2002
Taking a picture apart: Memory for backgrounds and objects in scene photographs
Author Affiliations
  • Jennifer S. DiMase
    Brigham and Women's Hospital, USA
  • Aude Oliva
    Brigham and Women's Hospital, USA
    Harvard Medical School, USA
  • Jeremy M. Wolfe
    Brigham and Women's Hospital, USA
    Harvard Medical School
Journal of Vision November 2002, Vol.2, 252. doi:10.1167/2.7.252
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jennifer S. DiMase, Aude Oliva, Jeremy M. Wolfe; Taking a picture apart: Memory for backgrounds and objects in scene photographs. Journal of Vision 2002;2(7):252. doi: 10.1167/2.7.252.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

After viewing thousands of images presented for a few seconds apiece, an observer can successfully distinguish old images from new ones (Standing, 1973). How is this accomplished? Do observers remember a list of objects? Do they remember the background (e.g. a beach)? In a variation of the standard picture memory experiment, we created photorealistic scenes of natural settings, urban places and indoors spaces. These consisted of a background and three added objects consistent with that background. Subjects were presented with 60 of these scenes for 3 seconds each, and then immediately tested for their memory. Test stimuli could have the same background, a similar background (e.g. a different beach with a similar spatial layout), or a different background. The 3 objects, too, could be the same or all different. Subjects made two responses; one about the novelty of the objects, the other about the background. Even though these stimuli resemble each other more than the usual picture memory stimuli, overall performance was quite good (objects: 74% correct, d′ = 1.37, backgrounds: 68% correct, d′=1.15). Poor performance was found in very specific situations. Whenever objects were incorrectly classified, performance on the background task dropped to chance. Whenever observers reported that an old background was new, they were poor at distinguishing old from new objects (d′ = .41). These results would be consistent with observers simply forgetting some scenes entirely. However, when observers erroneously reported that a new background was old, classification of objects remained quite good (d′=1.02 or 0.85 depending on the type of new background). Clearly, observers can recall the global background and the local objects in a briefly presented scene. These sources of information interact asymmetrically. Forgotten objects predict a forgotten background, but a forgotten background may accompany remembered objects.

DiMase, J. S., Oliva, A., Wolfe, J. M.(2002). Taking a picture apart: Memory for backgrounds and objects in scene photographs [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2( 7): 252, 252a, http://journalofvision.org/2/7/252/, doi:10.1167/2.7.252. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Supported by NIMH MH56020.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×