November 2002
Volume 2, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   November 2002
Inhibitory interactions in MT receptive fields
Author Affiliations
  • Nicole C. Rust
    Center for Neural Science and HHMI, New York University, New York, NY
Journal of Vision November 2002, Vol.2, 413. doi:10.1167/2.7.413
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Nicole C. Rust, Eero P. Simoncelli, J. Anthony Movshon; Inhibitory interactions in MT receptive fields. Journal of Vision 2002;2(7):413. doi: 10.1167/2.7.413.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Most neurons in macaque area MT (V5) respond vigorously to stimuli moving in a preferred direction, and are suppressed by motion in the opposite direction. The excitatory inputs come from specific groups of directionally selective neurons in lower-order areas, but the inhibitory signals are not so well understood. Some models (e.g. Simoncelli and Heeger, 1998, Vision Res) assume that these signals are pooled across the receptive field, but Qian et al. (1994, J Neurosci) suggested instead that inhibitory inputs interact with excitatory ones only within local regions of space.

To explore the location and direction specificity of interactions between MT receptive field subregions, we stimulated small areas of the receptive field with Gabor patches drifting in the preferred direction. We presented these alone and in combination with stimuli drifting in non-preferred directions so that we could study inhibitory signals against background firing elevated by preferred stimuli. Non-preferred gratings suppressed responses strongly when they were presented in the same retinal location as the preferred grating. When the two gratings were separated, suppression was much reduced and was no larger than the suppression of spontaneous firing produced by a non-preferred stimulus presented alone.

Our results show that non-preferred stimuli can only inhibit responses generated by excitatory stimuli from nearby regions of space; this suggests that direction-specific inhibition acts within spatially localized subregions of the receptive field. The results can be described by a model in which local excitation and inhibition are combined and rectified before a final stage of spatial pooling.

Rust, N. C., Simoncelli, E. P., Movshon, J. A.(2002). Inhibitory interactions in MT receptive fields [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2( 7): 413, 413a, http://journalofvision.org/2/7/413/, doi:10.1167/2.7.413. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Footnotes
 Supported by NEI and HHMI
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×