November 2002
Volume 2, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   November 2002
The independence of counting and contrast
Author Affiliations
  • Melanie Palomares
    Johns Hopkins University
Journal of Vision November 2002, Vol.2, 476. doi:10.1167/2.7.476
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Melanie Palomares, Howard E. Egeth; The independence of counting and contrast. Journal of Vision 2002;2(7):476. doi: 10.1167/2.7.476.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The task of detection requires that at least one target component (i.e. “feature”) be detected, while the task of identification requires the detection and integration of multiple features into a recognizable object. Enumeration seems to be an intermediate stage between feature detection and object identification. As in identification, it requires the detection of multiple features, but as in detection, it does not require the encoding of relative feature positions. As we count 1,2, 3…10, enumeration inherently seems to be a serial detection of items. However, when we enumerate briefly presented objects, we have a capacity to accurately report 4–5 items. Enumeration within this range is called subitizing.

In subitizing, do we automatically spatially integrate features? Feature detection is dependent on contrast. As the visibility of the features is decreased the number of activated feature detectors is less. If subitizing only requires detection, then as we decrease the contrast, the subitizing capacity (4–5 items) should also decrease. However if the subitizing capacity is independent of contrast, it must be processed by a second stage of integration that is independent of the first stage of feature detection.

In order to determine whether subitizing requires feature integration, we measured accuracy as a number of Gabor patches presented at different contrasts. The Gabors were presented for 50 ms along an imaginary circle at 5 deg viewing eccentricity. We found that the maximum accuracy changed with contrast, but the subitizing capacity (4 items) is immune to the effects of contrast. This means that subitizing requires feature integration.

Palomares, M., Egeth, H. E.(2002). The independence of counting and contrast [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2( 7): 476, 476a, http://journalofvision.org/2/7/476/, doi:10.1167/2.7.476. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×