November 2002
Volume 2, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   November 2002
Dynamics of contour integration and segmentation
Author Affiliations
  • Jean Lorenceau
    UNIC-CNRS
  • Anne Giersch
    Lab. Psychopharmacologie
  • Peggy Seriés
    UNIC-CNRS
Journal of Vision November 2002, Vol.2, 479. doi:10.1167/2.7.479
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jean Lorenceau, Anne Giersch, Peggy Seriés; Dynamics of contour integration and segmentation. Journal of Vision 2002;2(7):479. doi: 10.1167/2.7.479.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Contour integration and contour segmentation are two opposite requirements of visual perception that presumably involve competitive processes. To study this issue, we used two collinear line-segments separated by a gap (35′ and 8.8′ of arc), translating clockwise or counterclockwise along a circular path, and measured the ability of human observers (n=13) to recover the direction of line-ends that signal contour discontinuities. Occlusion by invisible masks that partially covered the line-segments was used to measure direction discrimination independently for inner line-ends (ILE) and outer line-ends (OLE). The results —percent correct and response time— indicate that processing ILEs' motion takes longer (by 60 msec; p<0.005) and yields more errors (by 18%; p<0.005) than processing OLE's motion. These differences are greatly reduced when line-segments are spatially offsets or are at an angle (60°) to each other, suggesting they strongly depend on segments' alignment. Psycho-pharmalogical testing was then used to assess the contribution of inhibition to these effects, using Lorazepam, a benzodiazepine that facilitates the fixation of GABA on GABA-A receptors. Observers (n=16) were tested in the ILE and OLE conditions before, during and after an intake of Lorazepam (0.038 mg/kg). In top of an expected global sedative effect of Lorazepam —yielding lengthened response times and increased error rates—, processing the motion of ILE and OLE was differentially affected, suggesting that Lorazepam boosted inhibition biases the competition between contour integration and segmentation. A simple model, in which facilitation through long-range horizontal connections (contour integration) competes with short-range end-stopping (contour segmentation), is proposed to account for the data.

Lorenceau, J., Giersch, A., Seriés, P.(2002). Dynamics of contour integration and segmentation [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2( 7): 479, 479a, http://journalofvision.org/2/7/479/, doi:10.1167/2.7.479. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×