November 2002
Volume 2, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   November 2002
Psychophysical dissociation of “how” and “what” tasks in normal participants
Author Affiliations
  • Charles Chubb
    Dept. of Cognitive Sciences, University of California at Irvine
Journal of Vision November 2002, Vol.2, 58. doi:10.1167/2.7.58
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Charles Chubb, Charles E. Wright, Susan Anderson, Peter Kim; Psychophysical dissociation of “how” and “what” tasks in normal participants. Journal of Vision 2002;2(7):58. doi: 10.1167/2.7.58.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Milner & Goodale, 1995, propose that visual processing splits into a ventral, “what” stream devoted to conscious recognition processes and a dorsal, “how” stream mediating motor control. Whereas the ventral stream receives input from both the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways, the dorsal stream receives only magnocellular input, suggesting that the “how” system may lack chromatic sensitivity. Here we assess the relative sensitivities to luminance versus chromatic variations in distinct tasks designed to selectively engage these two processing streams. Method: Taskwhat required the subject to register with a buttonpress the orientation (right, left, up or down) of a foveal isoceles triangle, briefly flashed, then masked. Taskhow required the subject to touch with a stylus the tip of the most acute angle of an isoceles triangle presented randomly in one of 4 orientations at one of 4 parafoveal locations. Each task used (i) equiluminant green targets varying in saturation, and (ii) isochromatic gray targets varying in luminance. Psychometric functions of green-target saturation and of gray-target luminance were obtained in Taskwhat. In Taskhow we measured movement duration and endpoint accuracy. Results: For saturation Green(p) and luminance Gray(p) yielding identical success rate p in Taskwhat, Green(p) targets yielded movement trajectories in Taskhow that were significantly slower and/or less accurate than Gray(p) targets. Conclusions: The process mediating performance in Taskwhat is relatively more sensitive to chromatic (vs. luminance) variations than the process mediating performance of Taskhow, supporting the dual claims that (i) Taskwhat and Taskhow selectively activate the “what” and “how” systems, and (ii) the “what” system is relatively more sensitive to chromatic variations than the “how” system.

Chubb, C., Wright, C. E., Anderson, S., Kim, P.(2002). Psychophysical dissociation of “how” and “what” tasks in normal participants [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2( 7): 58, 58a, http://journalofvision.org/2/7/58/, doi:10.1167/2.7.58. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×