November 2002
Volume 2, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   November 2002
Memory for moving faces: Effects of rigid and non-rigid motion
Author Affiliations
  • Sarah M. Snow
    University of Texas at Dallas, USA
  • George J. Lannen
    University of Texas at Dallas, USA
  • Alice J. O'Toole
    University of Texas at Dallas, USA
  • Herve Abdi
    University of Texas at Dallas, USA
Journal of Vision November 2002, Vol.2, 600. doi:10.1167/2.7.600
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sarah M. Snow, George J. Lannen, Alice J. O'Toole, Herve Abdi; Memory for moving faces: Effects of rigid and non-rigid motion. Journal of Vision 2002;2(7):600. doi: 10.1167/2.7.600.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Recent studies indicate that memory for familiar/famous faces can be improved when the faces are viewed in motion. For relatively unfamiliar faces, however, the role of motion in face memory is less clear. Several studies have yielded inconsistent results, suggesting the possibility that different types of motion may affect recognition accuracy in different ways. We examined the effects of non-rigid facial speech movements (Exp. 1) and rigid face rotation movements (Exp. 2) on recognition accuracy.

In Experiment 1, faces were presented and tested as either moving video clips or as still frontal images. The moving video clips were non-audible frontal faces talking directly to the viewer. Both the video and static presentations were matched for exposure time. The results indicated that face recognition was less accurate for the moving faces than for the static faces.

In Experiment 2, recognition accuracy was assessed in four conditions. In the first condition, participants viewed video clips of individuals rotating their head, from left to right profile, through nine equally spaced viewpoints. In the second condition, participants viewed still frontal images of faces. To control for the additional view information available in the motion clips, a third and fourth group of participants learned faces from the nine static images taken from viewpoints used in the video. These were presented in sequential or random order. Although recognition memory for moving faces was better than memory for the static frontal images, the availability of additional view information accounted for this advantage.

In conclusion, not all facial motions have similar effects on recognition. A plausible interpretation of the recognition disadvantage found with facial speech is that processing socially relevant facial motions may distract people from paying attention to the identity of a face.

Snow, S. M., Lannen, G. J., O'Toole, A. J., Abdi, H.(2002). Memory for moving faces: Effects of rigid and non-rigid motion [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2( 7): 600, 600a, http://journalofvision.org/2/7/600/, doi:10.1167/2.7.600. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Supported by a DOD/DARPA grant to A.O & H.A.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×