November 2002
Volume 2, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   November 2002
Configural processing is not global processing: Insights from prosopagnosia
Author Affiliations
  • Patricia A. McMullen
    Dalhousie University, Canada
Journal of Vision November 2002, Vol.2, 606. doi:10.1167/2.7.606
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Patricia A. McMullen; Configural processing is not global processing: Insights from prosopagnosia. Journal of Vision 2002;2(7):606. doi: 10.1167/2.7.606.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Prosopagnosia is a selective loss of the ability to recognize faces as a result of brain damage. A well-accepted explanation for this disability is the loss of a mechanism involved in visual configural processing. A seemingly related visual process is the ability to allocate attention to the global aspect of an object. The relationship between these two processes was tested with an individual with prosopagnosia. It was predicted that if these two processes are one and the same then a prosopagnosic should be impaired at global processing. Normal control participants were also tested. Navon-type figures were presented in an undirected attention task in which a 2 or a 5 occurred at either the global or local level. The task was to identify which of these numbers was present during a trial. Size of the figures was also varied (3, 6, 9 and 12 deg. of visual angle). Contrary to the prediction, the prosopagnosic demonstrated superior global processing relative to local processing at all stimulus sizes. More interesting was the fact that as the stimuli increased in size, local processing worsened. In contrast, normal control participants demonstrated a well known interaction under these conditions; global processing was superior when stimuli were small in size and local processing was superior when stimuli were large in size. These results fail to support the notion that configural processing is global processing and introduce some new notions of the deficit underlying prosopagnosia.

McMullen, P. A.(2002). Configural processing is not global processing: Insights from prosopagnosia [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2( 7): 606, 606a, http://journalofvision.org/2/7/606/, doi:10.1167/2.7.606. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 This study was funded by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Human Frontiers Science Program.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×