November 2002
Volume 2, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   November 2002
How do observers weight the otolith signal in a heading estimation task?
Author Affiliations
  • Matthew P. Sibigtroth
    University of California, Berkeley
Journal of Vision November 2002, Vol.2, 664. doi:10.1167/2.7.664
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Matthew P. Sibigtroth, Martin S. Banks, Paul R. MacNeilage; How do observers weight the otolith signal in a heading estimation task?. Journal of Vision 2002;2(7):664. doi: 10.1167/2.7.664.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

When an observer moves through a scene, visual and non-visual cues can aid heading estimation. One cue, the optic flow field, strongly influences perceived heading. Another cue, otolith stimulation signaling linear acceleration, also affects perceived heading (Sibigtroth & Banks, 2001). It is not known how these two cues are combined to determine one's heading. Specifically, we wondered what cues determine the weight of the otolith signal. There are two hypotheses: 1) the otolith weight increases with the magnitude of the otolith signal, and 2) the otolith weight increases with the visually-specified speed. We presented optic flow displays simulating curvilinear translation (100–800 cm/s) across a ground plane. Gaze was tangent to the path. We presented two path curvatures and these gave rise to rotation rates of 1–12 deg/s. To stimulate the otoliths, we exploited the fact that when an observer is on a curved path with centripetal acceleration x, the resultant gravito-inertial force is applied to the head at an angle whose sine is x. We simulated this force by rotating observers about the roll axis. To determine the relative influence of the flow field and the otolith signals, we independently manipulated the centripetal acceleration specified by the optic flow field, and that specified by the otolith signal (or equivalently, the roll angle). In particular, for a given path curvature and visually-specified speed, the visual stimulus did not vary with roll. Observers indicated their perceived path at the end of a 9-sec motion sequence. The majority of observers gave the otolith signal higher weight as visually-specified speed increased, consistent with hypothesis 2.

Sibigtroth, M. P., Banks, M. S., MacNeilage, P. R.(2002). How do observers weight the otolith signal in a heading estimation task? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2( 7): 664, 664a, http://journalofvision.org/2/7/664/, doi:10.1167/2.7.664. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×