November 2002
Volume 2, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   November 2002
Using external noise methods to isolate mechanisms of attention/perceptual learning
Author Affiliations
  • Zhong-Lin Lu
    University of Southern California, USA
  • Barbara A. Dosher
    UC Irvine, USA
Journal of Vision November 2002, Vol.2, 67. doi:10.1167/2.7.67
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Zhong-Lin Lu, Barbara A. Dosher; Using external noise methods to isolate mechanisms of attention/perceptual learning. Journal of Vision 2002;2(7):67. doi: 10.1167/2.7.67.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

We proposed a theoretical framework to distinguish three mechanisms underlying performance improvements in visual attention (1–5) and perceptual learning (6,7): stimulus enhancement, external noise exclusion via template retuning, and reduction of contrast gain-control or multiplicative noise. Measuring TVCs (threshold vs external noise contrast) at multiple performance levels under joint manipulations of external noise and attention/training can characterize the nonlinearities in the perceptual system and distinguish mechanisms and their mixtures (7,8). In visual attention, several pure cases of template retuning (2–4) and stimulus enhancement (1,4,5 have been reported. In perceptual learning in visual periphery, we found a mixture of stimulus enhancement and template retuning (6). Gold et al.(9) replicated our results with other stimuli; but instead concluded that perceptual learning only changed the signal not the noise. Our conclusions were based on a multiple-TVC constraint on nonlinearity, while Gold et al's were based on double-pass response consistency (10). However, the double pass method only assesses the internal to external noise ratio. We show that response consistency is a function only of the ratio. Mathematically, neither the multiple-TVC nor the double-pass method can distinguish stimulus enhancement from internal additive noise reduction, nor a mixture of stimulus enhancement + external noise exclusion from the changes only in signal claimed by Gold et al. We discuss empirical results, the mathematical properties of multiple-TVCs and measures of response consistency, their relation to different classes of observer models, and to performance signatures of attention and perceptual learning.

1. LuDosher VR'98. 2. DosherLu PsychSci'99. 3. DosherLu VR'00. 4. LuDosher JEPHPP'00. 5. Lu VR'00. 6. DosherLu PNAS'98. 7. DosherLu VR'99. 8. LuDosher JOSA'99. 9. Gold Nature'99. 10. BurgessColborne JOSA'88.

Lu, Z.-L., Dosher, B. A.(2002). Using external noise methods to isolate mechanisms of attention/perceptual learning [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2( 7): 67, 67a, http://journalofvision.org/2/7/67/, doi:10.1167/2.7.67. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Supported by AFOSR, NIMH & NSF.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×