The present study was designed to elucidate the PF for the thioltransferase gene (Grx1).
There have been reports that ketamine/xylazine anesthesia causes a transient increase of light-scattering within 5 hours of induction.
48 However, it has also been shown that at extended periods after induction, there is no significant increase of light-scattering.
49 In the present study, we observed the lenses at 48 hours after exposure to UVR. Therefore, it is unlikely that observed opacities were associated with the anesthetics.
The fact that the lenses macroscopically developed more opacities with increasing dose of UVR at close to threshold dose (
Fig. 1) is consistent with our previous findings for the C57BL/6 mouse.
40 In the present study, only subcapsular and cortical opacities were observed macroscopically both in
Grx1 −/− and in
Grx1 +/+ mice lenses (
Fig. 1). Our laboratory previously reported that also nuclear cataract may occur in
Grx1 −/− and in
Grx1 +/+ mice lenses, with an incidence of around 10%,
40,46 but in a subsequent study, we found only anterior subcapsular opacities.
41 A similar low incidence of nuclear cataract was observed in the rat lens exposed to a near-threshold dose of UVR.
50 Nuclear cataract was reported as an end stage of short-delay onset lens damage in the rat lens after a 10-times-threshold dose.
51 It was demonstrated that the in vivo penetration depth for UVR-300 nm in the rat lens is on the order of 0.5 mm.
52 Therefore, we believe that the infrequent nuclear cataract observed after a near-threshold dose reflects an occasional more serious biological response to the initial damage at the anterior surface caused by the exposure to UVR-300 nm.
Our observation that the differences of light-scattering in lenses from
Grx1 +/+ mice increased less than the differences of light-scattering in lenses from
Grx1 −/− mice (
Fig. 2) strongly support the notion that the Grx1 gene is protective. This conclusion is consistent with previous in vitro findings.
38 Further, the current result supports the previous observation that Grx1 is resistant to oxidative stress.
34,35
The confidence intervals for MTD2.3:16 presently estimated are relatively wide. This is an inherent problem in all threshold dose estimation. Threshold dose estimation relies on an estimate of the dose–response relationship and a criterion for least significant response. If the dose–response relationship is estimated at doses far from the least significant response and for a large enough interval, the change in response per change of dose within the interval studied can be estimated with high precision in a small sample. However, the dose–response is not reliable at low doses evoking close to a least significant response. At doses small enough to cause close to a least-significant response, variability is inherent and a highly precise estimate of threshold dose would require a sample size that is questionable in animal experiments.
Considering UVR exposures at the same irradiance with and without protection, the PF expresses how much longer UVR exposure the protection allows before the toxic effect of the UVR exposure occurs. In the present study, we found that
Grx1 +/+ compared with
Grx1 −/− is associated with a PF of 1.3. Thus, an intact Grx1 gene allows a 1.3-times longer exposure to UVR-300 nm than if the Grx1 gene is absent before significant short-delay onset of light-scattering occurs. This finding is consistent with our previous results that
Grx1 −/− increases lens susceptibility to UVR-B induced oxidative stress in the mouse.
41 It should be emphasized that both the current observation and the previous finding hold for short-delay–onset light-scattering, after single exposure to a near-threshold dose in vivo exposure to UVR. Whether Grx1 has the same protective effect on long-term daily subthreshold exposure is beyond the scope of the present study.
Several extrinsic and intrinsic antioxidant systems have been described for the lens.
7,15,26 –29 A problem in determining the significance of each of these systems has been the lack of a method for quantitative comparison of the in vivo importance. The PF as presented herein aids in making that comparison. It may be that, at a low degree of oxidative stress, the relative impact of various antioxidants differs. However, the same strategy could be used for quantitative comparison of antioxidant systems in daily subthreshold exposures if the accumulated effect of daily subthreshold exposure evokes a least-significant toxic response.