December 2003
Volume 3, Issue 12
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   December 2003
Glass pattern studies of contrast effects in feature integration and segmentation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Eugene Switkes
    University of California, Santa Cruz, USA
  • J. A. Wilson
    University of Texas, USA
  • Russell L. Valois
    University of California, Berkeley, USA
  • Footnotes
     Switkes, E. (2002) Integration of differing chromaticities in early and midlevel spatial vision, FVM-2002
Journal of Vision December 2003, Vol.3, 4. doi:10.1167/3.12.4
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Eugene Switkes, J. A. Wilson, Russell L. Valois; Glass pattern studies of contrast effects in feature integration and segmentation. Journal of Vision 2003;3(12):4. doi: 10.1167/3.12.4.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Glass patterns are ideal stimuli to study both local visual processing, where individual dots must be combined to form a perceptual pair, and global processes, where local oriented-pairs are integrated into patterns. At FVM-2002§ we described effects of chromatic variations on the detection of Glass correlations. We now report how luminance contrast variations alter an observer's ability to extract local features and to globally integrate dot-pairs.

We measured thresholds for pattern detection of rotational, translational, and hyperbolic correlations. Variation of the relative contrast of the dots within a dot-pair was used to investigate extraction of local oriented elements. Manipulation of contrast between dot-pairs allowed us to study the effects of contrast differences on the global integration of local features. Contrast variations included differences in contrast magnitude, where all dot-contrasts had the same polarity (increments or decrements), as well as differing contrast polarities.

For within-dot-pair contrast variations, we find: i) dots of opposite contrast polarity cannot be integrated to form local oriented features (as previously reported, Glass and Switkes, 1976); ii) for same-polarity contrast differences, integration is possible but thresholds increase as the ratio of the within-pair dot contrast increases; and iii) translational and rotational patterns give similar results. For between-dot-pair contrast variations, we find: i) correlated dot-pairs become more easily segregated from noise-pairs as the contrast difference between the signal and noise components increases; however ii) detection of translational correlations is reduced by noise of opposite-polarity while thresholds for rotational and hyperbolic patterns are unaffected by opposite-polarity noise of any contrast.

We present models of local and global processing to explain these observations. The contributions of the third-co-author to the study, as well as three decades of his provocative colleagueship and friendship, make it a special pleasure for me to present our work at this symposium honoring Professor Russell DeValois.

GlassL.SwitkesE.(1976). Pattern recognition in humans: correlations which cannot be perceived. Perception, 5, 67–72.

Switkes, E., Wilson, J. A., De  Valois, R. L.(2003). Glass pattern studies of contrast effects in feature integration and segmentation [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 3( 12): 4, 4a,, doi:10.1167/3.12.4. [CrossRef]
 †Research supported by NFS grant IBN-01168895

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.