October 2003
Volume 3, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2003
Are human observers performing wavelet denoising?
Author Affiliations
  • William H McIlhagga
    Dept of Optometry, University of Bradford, Bradford, England
Journal of Vision October 2003, Vol.3, 361. doi:10.1167/3.9.361
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      William H McIlhagga; Are human observers performing wavelet denoising?. Journal of Vision 2003;3(9):361. doi: 10.1167/3.9.361.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Wavelet denoising (Donoho & Johnstone 1994) is a powerful method for removing noise from signals encoded by a set of wavelet coefficients. Many aspects of human detection and discrimination can be explained by assuming that the human visual system uses wavelet denoising in visual decision tasks.

In wavelet denoising, coefficients less than a threshold sigma*sqrt(2log(n)) are assumed to be mostly noise, and set to zero (sigma is the noise standard deviation and n is the number of coefficients). Applying this procedure to vision, an image is represented as the outputs of a set of n V1 neurons, which may form a sparse wavelet-like code (Field 1994). V1 neurons with activity less than the threshold are ignored in decision-making.

The denoising threshold is identical to the decision threshold implied by Pelli's (1985) uncertain observer. In Pelli's model, the observer is correct when one relevant detector exceeds the maximum of M irrelevant detectors, having expectation sigma*sqrt(2log(M)) (Galambos, 1985). Simulations of the denoising model show that it matches Pelli's model.

However, the denoising model can be extended in two ways. First, the noise threshold can be adapted to the frequency spectrum of the noise. Thus noise that differs substantially from the signal has little effect on detection. Second, the denoising model can be combined with template-based detection models, and this leads to a separation of intrinsic uncertainty (manifest through the denoising threshold) and extrinsic uncertainty (manifest through the use of multiple templates).

DonohoD.L.JohnstoneI.M.(1994) Ideal spatial adaptation via wavelet shrinkage, Biometrika 81 425–455

FieldD.J.(1994) What is the goal of sensory coding? Neural Computation 6 559–601

GalambosJ. 1985. The Asymptotic Theory of Extreme Order Statistics, Krieger Publishing, Malabar, Florida

PelliD.G.(1985) Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination, JOSA A2 1508–1532

McIlhagga, W. H.(2003). Are human observers performing wavelet denoising? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 3( 9): 361, 361a, http://journalofvision.org/3/9/361/, doi:10.1167/3.9.361. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×