June 2004
Volume 4, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2004
Confidence grows with uncertainty in visual search.
Author Affiliations
  • Stefano Baldassi
    Faculty of Psychology, University of Florence, Italy
  • David C. Burr
    Faculty of Psychology, University of Florence, Italy
  • Nicola Megna
    Department of Psychology, University of Florence, Italy
Journal of Vision August 2004, Vol.4, 166. doi:10.1167/4.8.166
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Stefano Baldassi, David C. Burr, Nicola Megna; Confidence grows with uncertainty in visual search.. Journal of Vision 2004;4(8):166. doi: 10.1167/4.8.166.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

A target tilted right or left of vertical is harder to discriminate when presented together with vertical distractors. The set-size effect is well explained by a Signed-Max model in which the subjects monitor two sets of noisy filters tuned clockwise (CW) and counter-clockwise (CCW), and choose the maximum (signed) response. An interesting corollary of this model is that, for large set sizes, the distribution of maxima is bimodal, with two distinct non-zero peaks for errors and correct responses, implying that observers should make “high confidence errors”. We tested this prediction using a magnitude estimation task: a target was tilted CW or CCW by a variable angle (between ±16 ), and subjects indicated both the direction and magnitude of the tilt (by clicking an appropriate icon). The target was intermingled with a variable number of vertical distractors equi-spaced around a circular array of 5° eccentricity. After collecting a total of over 1000 trials, we plotted histograms of magnitude estimation separately for correct responses and errors (for the tilt angle yielding d'=1) for each subject and set-size. For set-size of 1, the distribution was unimodal and symmetric. For large set-sizes it was bimodal, with the two peaks becoming sharper and more separated with increasing set size. At set-size 16 the peak response for errors was ∼3 tilt, suggesting that subjects saw the responses clearly in the wrong direction. The results do not simply reflect the higher thresholds with large set-size, as adding noise to the set-size 1 condition (to equate thresholds with the set-size 16 condition) did not change the shape of the distribution. The pattern of data confirm the prediction of the SDT based Signed-Max model, that under conditions of high stimulus uncertainty, where a distractor may be mistaken for the target by chance, subjects make many “high-confidence errors”, and “see” the stimulus oriented in the wrong direction. By a large amount.

Baldassi, S., Burr, D. C., Megna, N.(2004). Confidence grows with uncertainty in visual search[Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4( 8): 166, 166a, http://journalofvision.org/4/8/166/, doi:10.1167/4.8.166. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.