June 2004
Volume 4, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2004
Role of endogenous orienting in object-based and space-based selection
Author Affiliations
  • Su-Ling Yeh
    Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Journal of Vision August 2004, Vol.4, 264. doi:10.1167/4.8.264
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Su-Ling Yeh, San-Yuan Lin; Role of endogenous orienting in object-based and space-based selection. Journal of Vision 2004;4(8):264. doi: 10.1167/4.8.264.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

We examined the relationship between orienting (exogenous vs. endogenous) and selection (space-based vs. object-based) of attention. The cueing paradigm of Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994) was adopted because the cue-validity effect and the same-object effect, which are indicative of space-based and object-based selection respectively, can be observed in the same task. Moreover, with the manipulation of cue informativeness (i.e., cue validity), exogenous and endogenous orienting could be induced alone or simultaneously in this paradigm. When the same informative peripheral cue as in Egly et al. (1994) was used, in which both endogenous and exogenous orienting were assumed to be induced, both the cue-validity effect and the same-object effect were obtained (Experiment 1). When an uninformative peripheral cue was applied to induce pure exogenous orienting, only an inhibition of return (IOR) at the cued location was obtained (Experiment 2). Experiment 3 used the same informative peripheral cue as in Experiment 1, but the object disappeared after the cue display for 200 ms (Experiment 3A) or 80 ms (Experiment 3B) before the target appeared. Results showed that the cue-validity effect was observed, but not the same-object effect. Thus, the same-object effect vanished under the two manipulations by either excluding the endogenous orienting (Experiment 2) or making the object disappear (Experiment 3). The cue-validity effect (Experiments 1 & 3), on the other hand, changed into an IOR effect with pure exogenous orienting (Experiment 2). We conclude that endogenous orienting is necessary but not sufficient for object-based selection, and that it modulates the space-based representation upon which exogenous orienting operates.

Yeh, S.-L., Lin, S.-Y.(2004). Role of endogenous orienting in object-based and space-based selection [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4( 8): 264, 264a, http://journalofvision.org/4/8/264/, doi:10.1167/4.8.264. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan, NSC91-2413-H-002-013
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×