September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
The absolute phase effect in energy model
Author Affiliations
  • Li Zhao
    Brain and Cognitive Sciences Institute, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan 471003, China, P.R.
  • Bart Farell
    Institute for Sensory Research, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY13244, USA
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 255. doi:10.1167/5.8.255
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Li Zhao, Bart Farell; The absolute phase effect in energy model. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):255. doi: 10.1167/5.8.255.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The energy model for motion and binocular vision has been considered to be invariant with respect to the absolute phases of the input stimuli1, 2. This has not been disputed since the introduction of the energy model (pointed out by an anonymous reviewer). However, Zhao and Farell 3 reported that the binocular energy model may depend on the absolute phases. Yet, many consider the result by Zhao and Farell 3 is due a bug in the simulation. Here we present an analytic proof showing that the energy model does depend on the absolute phases of the input stimuli.

For a sinusoidal stimulus oriented parallel to the major axis of the receptive field of complex cells, the model yields a response for these cells that is the sum of three parts: (1) cos2 {[(p 1r−p 2r)+( p 1s−p 2s)]/2} and a constant. Here p 1r and p 2r are the absolute phases of the receptive fields, p 1s and p 2s are the absolute phases of the input stimuli. (2) cos2 {[(p 1r−p 2r)+( p 1s−p 2s)]/2} and a constant; (3) cos( p 1s+p 2s) [(cos(p 1r−p 2r)+ cos( p 1s−p 2s)] and a constant. Clearly, the first and the second terms do not depend on the absolute phases of the input stimuli since (p 1s−p 2s) is the relative phase of the input stimuli. However, because of cos(p 1s+p 2s), the third term depends on the absolute phases.

This theoretical result is analytical without any approximation—This is fundamentally different from former research on the analysis of the energy model. Therefore the analytical result should give every detail of the information of the model. Furthermore, the proof can be easily generalized to related stimuli, such as gabor patches.

The proof also holds for the motion energy model, since it is a special case of the binocular energy model.

References:

1. E.H Adelson, J. Bergen (1985) JOSA A, 2, 284.

2. I. Ohzawa, G.C. DeAngelis, R.D. Freeman. (1990) Science, 249, 1037.

3. L. Zhao, B. Farell. (2002) Journal of Vision. 2(7), 312.

Zhao, L. Farell, B. (2005). The absolute phase effect in energy model [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):255, 255a, http://journalofvision.org/5/8/255/, doi:10.1167/5.8.255. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×