September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
Spatial organization of L- and M-cone inputs to neurons in the macaque lateral geniculate nucleus
Author Affiliations
  • Samuel G. Solomon
    University Laboratory of Physiology, University of Oxford, and Center for Neural Science, New York University
  • Neel T. Dhruv
    Center for Neural Science, New York University
  • Peter Lennie
    Center for Neural Science, New York University
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 264. doi:10.1167/5.8.264
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Samuel G. Solomon, Neel T. Dhruv, Peter Lennie; Spatial organization of L- and M-cone inputs to neurons in the macaque lateral geniculate nucleus. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):264. doi: 10.1167/5.8.264.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

In chromatically opponent retinal ganglion cells and LGN neurons in macaque it has been hard to establish how the different types of cones contribute to centers and surrounds of receptive fields. To pursue this we recorded in anaesthetized macaque monkeys from parafoveal LGN neurons driven by drifting gratings that modulated only L-cones or only M-cones (cone isolating) or modulated both in concert (L+M). A receptive field that has few cones in its center should be orientation-selective when driven by gratings of preferred or higher-than-preferred spatial frequencies. If both L and M cones provide input to the center, preferred orientation should vary with grating chromaticity. If both cone types provide input to the surround, we should see band-pass rather than low-pass spatial frequency tuning for cone-isolating stimuli. Among magnocellular cells, both cone types provided input to center and surround: neurons showed band-pass tuning, and orientation specificity for cone isolating and L+M gratings could vary significantly. Parvocellular (P) cells behaved differently. Receptive field centers were usually driven by one class of cone: orientation specificity was found in most cells, and was strongest in cells with M-cone centers, but did not depend on chromaticity. In cells with M-cone dominated centers, band-pass spatial frequency tuning was rarely observed for M-cone isolating gratings, and spatial resolution for L-cone isolating gratings was low. In cells with L-cone dominated centers, band-pass spatial frequency tuning for cone isolating gratings was more common, and spatial resolution for M-cone gratings was often close to that for L-cone gratings. Nevertheless, L- and M-cone inputs remained antagonistic at high spatial frequencies. Since L-cones are more prevalent, the different characteristics of P-cells that have L- rather than M-cone centers is consistent with unspecific wiring of cone inputs to the surround. Cone inputs to the center seem substantially more specific.

Solomon, S. G. Dhruv, N. T. Lennie, P. (2005). Spatial organization of L- and M-cone inputs to neurons in the macaque lateral geniculate nucleus [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):264, 264a, http://journalofvision.org/5/8/264/, doi:10.1167/5.8.264. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×