September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
Does eye dominance predict fMRI signals in retinotopic cortex?
Author Affiliations
  • Janine D. Mendola
    West Virginia University, USA
  • Ian P. Conner
    West Virginia University, USA
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 284. doi:10.1167/5.8.284
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Janine D. Mendola, Ian P. Conner; Does eye dominance predict fMRI signals in retinotopic cortex?. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):284. doi: 10.1167/5.8.284.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

In studies of human amblyopia with fMRI techniques, we have considered the relationship between psychophysical measures of eye dominance and measured BOLD signals. To obtain comparable control data, eye dominance should be defined in normal subjects. There have been attempts to define eye dominance in normal subjects, although limited consensus exists. In this study, we consider two different definitions of eye dominance: one based on cognitive sighting preference, and the other based on superior resolution acuity. Sighting eye dominance was assessed with two standard tests, the Porta Test, and a ‘hole in hand’ variation of the Miles Test. We tested visual acuity with a Snellen eye chart as well as a computerized test of grating acuity, with greater expected sensitivity and selectivity. We found little correspondence between the dominance assignments made on the basis of sighting versus acuity. We next compared the fMRI signal magnitude generated by the dominant eye to that generated by non-dominant eye stimulation, according to either of the criteria, in 7 control subjects. Experiment 1 used a high contrast achromatic hemifield stimulus alternating with no stimulus in a blocked paradigm. Experiment 2 employed chromatic phase-encoded eccentricity and polar angle stimuli. The results from Experiment 2 provided a field-sign map for each subject that was used to define regions of interest (ROIs) corresponding to six visual areas (V1, V2, V3, VP, V4, V3A). We found that fMRI signals were significantly stronger in the dominant eye according to the acuity criterion. This consistent dominance effect was apparent for all retinotopic areas, especially those located in the ventral occipital territory (V1v, V2v, VP, V4). In contrast, using the cognitive criterion produced no significant interocular fMRI differences. We conclude that interocular BOLD differences in normal subjects are substantial, and may be predicted by acuity measures.

Mendola, J. D. Conner, I. P. (2005). Does eye dominance predict fMRI signals in retinotopic cortex? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):284, 284a, http://journalofvision.org/5/8/284/, doi:10.1167/5.8.284. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Supported by grant I P20 RR15574-01 from NIH/NCRR to JM.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×