September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
The influence of vision on the estimation of walked distance
Author Affiliations
  • Jennifer L. Campos
    McMaster University, Canada
  • Celia Hsiao
    McMaster University, Canada
  • George S. W. Chan
    McMaster University, Canada
  • Hong Jin Sun
    McMaster University, Canada
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 305. doi:10.1167/5.8.305
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jennifer L. Campos, Celia Hsiao, George S. W. Chan, Hong Jin Sun; The influence of vision on the estimation of walked distance. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):305. doi: 10.1167/5.8.305.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Traversed distance estimation is influenced by both visual cues (particularly optic flow) and locomotor cues (proprioceptive/efferent copy and vestibular). While evidence suggests that locomotor cues alone can be used to estimate distance, little is known about the role of optic flow when both visual and locomotor cues are available simultaneously. The current study employed a consecutive cue-conflict paradigm to compare distance estimates obtained via locomotor cues alone to those obtained via both locomotor and optic flow cues. This experiment took place in a large, open, outdoor environment. Subjects (Ss) were presented with two distances, which they were informed were identical in magnitude; one via blindfolded locomotion (L) and one via locomotion with vision (LV) (with the order of the two randomized). For the majority of the trials, the magnitude of the two stimulus distances was indeed the same (congruent), but for a small subset of trials the two distances differed in magnitude (incongruent). Subsequently, Ss produced an estimate by adjusting the distance of a visual target to match the learned distance. Overall, a small underestimation was observed in all cases. For congruent trials, when the same cues were present in both stimulus distances, estimates were slightly shorter for LV than for L. However, when different cues were present in the two stimulus distances, there was also an effect of cue presentation order. When LV occurred second, distance estimates were much shorter than when LV occurred first. For incongruent trials, the effect of cue was compounded with a powerful effect of distance presentation order. When the longer distance was presented second, estimates more closely approximated the longer distance, whereas when the shorter distance was presented second, estimates more closely approximated the shorter distance. This effect was more prominent when LV occurred second, indicating a dominant effect of vision and an interaction between cue and presentation order.

Campos, J. L. Hsiao, C. Chan, G. S. W. Sun, H. (2005). The influence of vision on the estimation of walked distance [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):305, 305a, http://journalofvision.org/5/8/305/, doi:10.1167/5.8.305. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 This work was supported by NSERC and CFI grants to HJS and an NSERC fellowship to JLC.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×