September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
Effect of directional noise on heading perception
Author Affiliations
  • Elif M. Sikoglu
    Brain and Vision Research Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
  • Lucia M. Vaina
    Brain and Vision Research Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA, and Harvard Medical School, Department of Neurology, Boston, MA, USA
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 839. doi:10.1167/5.8.839
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Elif M. Sikoglu, Lucia M. Vaina; Effect of directional noise on heading perception. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):839. doi: 10.1167/5.8.839.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Watamaniuk et al. (1989) demonstrated in a 2-D direction discrimination task that the difference between mean and perceived directions was modulated by a specified range of directionally constrained noise. Here we are interested to learn whether a similar effect could be observed in a heading perception task.

The experiment consisted of a random dot kinematograms (RDK) of expanding motion that produces the illusion of straight line heading shown at 44×44 deg2 aperture for 482 ms.. At the end of the motion, the RDK was replaced by a static random dot frame with the same statistical properties as the RDK and a vertical line. Observers were asked to determine whether heading direction was to the left or right of the vertical line. Adaptive staircase procedures were used to measure the accuracy of the heading perception (at 79%-correct level). Three experimental conditions differing in the directional noise perturbations were employed: 1) Random-walk: Each dot was perturbed independently from its direction in the previous frame; 2) Fixed-trajectory: Each dot kept the same perturbed direction throughout its lifetime; 3) General Perturbation: Location of heading direction was perturbed frame by frame.

In heading perception without noise, observers' accuracy was about 2°. Accuracy dropped to roughly 10°, when range of perturbation was 87°±4.6° for random-walk and 56°±8.5° for fixed-trajectory conditions. As the amount of perturbations increased, thresholds systematically increased in all three conditions (p < 0.05, slope of linear fits to perturbation range vs. threshold).

The results indicate that in the presence of either local (conditions 1 and 2) or global (condition 3) directional noise, heading direction can still be perceived. This implies that under noisy conditions both temporal and spatial integration mechanisms may help heading perception, suggesting that precise local direction perception is not required for the task.

Sikoglu, E. M. Vaina, L. M. (2005). Effect of directional noise on heading perception [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):839, 839a, http://journalofvision.org/5/8/839/, doi:10.1167/5.8.839. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 NIH grant R01EY007861-15 L.M.V.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×