September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
Biological motion versus coherent motion perception: The role of the cerebellum
Author Affiliations
  • Daniel Jokisch
    Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany, and International Graduate School of Neuroscience, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
  • Irene Daum
    Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany, and International Graduate School of Neuroscience, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
  • Benno Koch
    Department of Neurology, Klinikum Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
  • Michael Schwarz
    Department of Neurology, Klinikum Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
  • Nikolaus F. Troje
    Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany, and Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 934. doi:10.1167/5.8.934
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Daniel Jokisch, Irene Daum, Benno Koch, Michael Schwarz, Nikolaus F. Troje; Biological motion versus coherent motion perception: The role of the cerebellum. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):934. doi: 10.1167/5.8.934.

      Download citation file:


      © 2016 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Perception of biological motion is a fundamental property of the human visual system. It is as yet unclear which role the cerebellum plays with respect to the perceptual analysis of biological motion represented as point-light displays. Imaging studies investigating biological motion perception revealed inconsistent results concerning cerebellar contribution. The present study aims to explore the role of the cerebellum in the perception of biological motion by testing the performance of biological motion perception in patients suffering from circumscribed cerebellar lesions and comparing their performance with an age-matched control group.

Perceptual performance was investigated in an experimental task testing the threshold to detect biological motion masked by scrambled motion and a control task testing detection of motion direction of coherent motion masked by random noise. Results show clear evidence for a differential contribution of the cerebellum to the perceptual analysis of coherent motion compared to biological motion. Whereas the ability to detect biological motion masked by scrambled motion was unaffected in the patient group, their ability to discriminate direction of coherent motion in random noise was substantially affected. We conclude that intact cerebellar function is not a prerequisite for a preserved ability to detect biological motion. Since the dorsal motion pathway as well as the ventral form pathway contribute to the visual perception of biological motion, the question remains open, whether cerebellar dysfunction affecting the dorsal pathway is compensated for by the not affected ventral pathway or whether perceptual analysis of biological motion is performed completely without cerebellar contribution.

Jokisch, D. Daum, I. Koch, B. Schwarz, M. Troje, N. F. (2005). Biological motion versus coherent motion perception: The role of the cerebellum [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):934, 934a, http://journalofvision.org/5/8/934/, doi:10.1167/5.8.934. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 This research was funded by the International Graduate School of Neuroscience (IGSN) of the University of Bochum, Germany and by the Volkswagen Foundation.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×