September 2005
Volume 5, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2005
Masking interrupts feedback processing
Author Affiliations
  • Johannes J. Fahrenfort
    University of Amsterdam
  • Steven H. S. Scholte
    University of Amsterdam
  • Victor A. F. Lamme
    University of Amsterdam, and The Netherlands Ophthalmic Research Institute
Journal of Vision September 2005, Vol.5, 963. doi:10.1167/5.8.963
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Johannes J. Fahrenfort, Steven H. S. Scholte, Victor A. F. Lamme; Masking interrupts feedback processing. Journal of Vision 2005;5(8):963. doi: 10.1167/5.8.963.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

In masking, a stimulus is rendered invisible through the presentation of a second stimulus shortly after the first. Although numerous accounts for masking have been given, an unequivocal explanation for this phenomenon remains elusive. However, neurophysiological studies from recent years indicate that visual perception depends strongly on cortico-cortical feedback connections from higher to lower tier visual areas. In macaque monkeys it has been shown that masking derives its effectiveness from interrupting these feedback processes. In this experiment, we used fMRI and EEG measurements to determine what happens in human visual cortex during detection of a texture defined square under masked and non-masked conditions. EEG derivatives that are typically associated with early feedback processing turn out to be absent in the masked condition. Moreover, preliminary fMRI results suggest that the masked stimulus still evokes activation of visual cortex, with higher visual areas being activated more strongly than lower areas. This indicates that feed-forward processing is preserved, even when subject performance is close to chance. From these results we conclude that in humans, as in macaques, masking derives its effectiveness from interrupting feedback projections.

Fahrenfort, J. J. Scholte, S. H. S. Lamme, V. A. F. (2005). Masking interrupts feedback processing [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):963, 963a, http://journalofvision.org/5/8/963/, doi:10.1167/5.8.963. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×