June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
A comparison of the Pulfrich and Flash-Pulfrich effects
Author Affiliations
  • Christopher R. L. Cantor
    Vision Science Program, University of California at Berkeley, USA
  • Clifton M. Schor
    Vision Science Program, University of California at Berkeley, USA, and School of Optometry, University of California at Berkeley, USA
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 1006. doi:10.1167/6.6.1006
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christopher R. L. Cantor, Clifton M. Schor; A comparison of the Pulfrich and Flash-Pulfrich effects. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):1006. doi: 10.1167/6.6.1006.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Last year (VSS 2005) we introduced a novel stereo-illusion, which we called the Flash-Pulfrich effect (FPE). While the classical Pulfrich Effect (PE) describes depth perceived when the half-images of a moving object have unequal brightness, the FPE describes depth perceived when one of the half-images is intermittently strobed, while the other is presented continuously.

We now ask whether and how the FPE and PE are related. Our data shows that the magnitude of the FPE is greater than that of the PE. This does not, however, preclude the possibility that a single mechanism might account for both.

Accordingly, we have developed a computational model for the FPE based on the basic response properties of LGN neurons. The model filters the input (in space and time) with a DoG spatial filter and the biphasic temporal impulse response of LGN neurons. We show that this model predicts differences in magnitude between the PE and FPE. We also examine how the magnitudes of the PE and FPE vary when basic stimulus parameters are changed (spatio-temporal frequency and retinal illuminance). We show that the trends in the stimulus dependence of the two effects are predictions of the model.

Cantor, C. R. L. Schor, C. M. (2006). A comparison of the Pulfrich and Flash-Pulfrich effects [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):1006, 1006a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/1006/, doi:10.1167/6.6.1006. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×