June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
Dot polarity in dynamic Glass patterns
Author Affiliations
  • Dawn Vreven
    University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh WI
  • Timothy Petersik
    Ripon College, Ripon WI
  • Jim Dannemiller
    Rice University, Houston TX
  • Jamie Schrauth
    University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh WI
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 1053. doi:10.1167/6.6.1053
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Dawn Vreven, Timothy Petersik, Jim Dannemiller, Jamie Schrauth; Dot polarity in dynamic Glass patterns. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):1053. doi: 10.1167/6.6.1053.

      Download citation file:

      © 2016 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

  • Supplements

Each frame of a Glass pattern consists of a random placement of dots and a spatially shifted copy of this pattern. Thus, each dot has a partner, forming dot-pair dipoles. When shown in succession, motion is perceived along the axis of the spatial shift. The perception of motion in dynamic Glass patterns is believed to be a two-stage process: first, local orientation detectors respond to the orientation signal in the dot-pair dipole; and second, global detectors integrate local orientation signals. We examined the ability to detect rotation in dynamic Glass patterns whose dipoles contained a) the same polarity, b) opposite polarity within a dipole, and c) opposite polarity between dipoles. We also manipulated the extent of spatial shift between the dots in a dipole. A two-interval forced procedure was used, and the proportion of dipoles spatially shifted to be consistent with rotation was varied. The task was to determine which interval (noise or signal + noise) contained rotation. When both dots in a dipole were the same polarity, rotation detection thresholds increased with increasing dot separation. The same pattern was found when dot polarity differed between dipoles. Thresholds were significantly elevated, however, when dot polarity differed within a dipole. Unlike other reports (Wilson, Switkes & DeValois, 2004), we find that observers are capable of discriminating between Glass patterns and random noise even when dot-pair dipoles are of opposite polarity. This outcome suggests an additional role for global mechanisms in the perception of motion from dynamic Glass patterns.

Vreven, D. Petersik, T. Dannemiller, J. Schrauth, J. (2006). Dot polarity in dynamic Glass patterns [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):1053, 1053a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/1053/, doi:10.1167/6.6.1053. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.