June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
Distinct temporal dynamics of cone-opponent and -nonopponent macaque primary visual cortical neurons
Author Affiliations
  • Venkata R. Posina
    Vision Center Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
  • Gregory D. Horwitz
    Vision Center Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
  • Thomas D. Albright
    Vision Center Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 121. doi:10.1167/6.6.121
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Venkata R. Posina, Gregory D. Horwitz, Thomas D. Albright; Distinct temporal dynamics of cone-opponent and -nonopponent macaque primary visual cortical neurons. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):121. doi: 10.1167/6.6.121.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Receptive field maps of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) of awake, fixating monkeys were obtained by spike-triggered averaging (STA) of checkerboard stimuli modulated along the three cone-isolating directions. Receptive field centers were within the central 5 deg. Most of the cells (81%) that we studied were cone-opponent, and 79% of these cone-opponent neurons had an L-cone signal opposed to M- and S-cone signals (“L vs. M&S” neurons). Examination of the temporal profile of STAs showed that the times-to-peak of cone-nonopponent neurons were shorter than those of cone-opponent neurons (61 vs. 73 ms). The three subtypes of cone-opponent neurons (i.e. “L vs. M&S”, “M vs. L&S”, and “S vs. L&M”) had same times-to-peak. The times-to-peak of the three cone signals were same in most neurons. Most of the cone-nonopponent neurons (83%) were temporally biphasic, while only 22% of the cone-opponent neurons were biphasic. The times-to-peak of biphasic neurons were shorter than those of monophasic neurons. Even within the subset of biphasic neurons, the times-to-peak of cone-nonopponent neurons were shorter than those of cone-opponent neurons (54 vs. 66 ms). The temporal properties of cone-nonopponent and cone-opponent neurons are consistent with a difference in the proportion of magnocellular and parvocellular input to these two groups of V1 cells. Moreover, the observed temporal differences between cone-nonopponent and cone-opponent neurons parallel the differences between the psychophysical luminance and chromatic mechanisms.

Posina, V. R. Horwitz, G. D. Albright, T. D. (2006). Distinct temporal dynamics of cone-opponent and -nonopponent macaque primary visual cortical neurons [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):121, 121a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/121/, doi:10.1167/6.6.121. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×