June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
Temporal aspects of contour and brightness processing in meta- and paracontrast
Author Affiliations
  • Haluk Ogmen
    Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Houston, and Center for Neuro-Engineering and Cognitive Science, University of Houston
  • Bruno G. Breitmeyer
    Center for Neuro-Engineering and Cognitive Science, University of Houston, and Department of Psychology, University of Houston
  • Hulusi Kafaligonul
    Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Houston
  • Steven Todd
    Department of Philosophy, University of Houston
  • Lynn Mardon
    Department of Philosophy, University of Houston
  • Ralph Ziegler
    Department of Psychology, University of Houston
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 122. doi:10.1167/6.6.122
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Haluk Ogmen, Bruno G. Breitmeyer, Hulusi Kafaligonul, Steven Todd, Lynn Mardon, Ralph Ziegler; Temporal aspects of contour and brightness processing in meta- and paracontrast. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):122. doi: 10.1167/6.6.122.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose. Existing evidence suggests that stimulus contours are processed faster than surface brightness or color. We investigate the temporal dynamics of contour and brightness visibility during meta- and paracontrast and use an updated RECOD model of visual masking to account for the findings.

Methods. Stimuli were a 0.85 deg disk (T), surrounded by a ring (M), 0.42 deg wide and separated by 0.05 deg, centered 1.4 deg above and 1.6 deg to the right of fixation. In the brightness masking, a match stimulus the same size as T was presented symmetrically to the left of fixation. In the contour masking, T was either a complete disk or one with either a lower or upper contour deletion.

Results. Whereas optimal metacontrast SOA was 10–15 ms in contour masking, it was 40 ms in brightness masking. In paracontrast 1) a local minimum of visibility was obtained around an SOA of −170 ms for both tasks, 2) a local enhancement of brightness visibility was obtained at an SOA of −40 ms, and c) a second period of suppression was evident, particularly in contour masking, at an SOA of −10 ms.

Conclusion. Brightness and contour are processed by separate slow and fast cortical parvo pathways, each subject to intrachannel inhibition and to interchannel inhibition by the still faster cortical magno activity. In addition, subcortical modulatory processes activated by the paracontrast mask may enhance the parvo brightness activity to the following target. These conclusions are supported by simulations of an updated RECOD model.

Ogmen, H. Breitmeyer, B. G. Kafaligonul, H. Todd, S. Mardon, L. Ziegler, R. (2006). Temporal aspects of contour and brightness processing in meta- and paracontrast [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):122, 122a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/122/, doi:10.1167/6.6.122. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 NSF BCS-0114533, NIH R01-MH49892
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×