June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
Attention effects on motion processing are larger in the left vs. the right visual field
Author Affiliations
  • Jennifer A. Feeney
    UCSD Department of Psychology
  • Karen R. Dobkins
    UCSD Department of Psychology
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 304. doi:10.1167/6.6.304
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jennifer A. Feeney, Karen R. Dobkins; Attention effects on motion processing are larger in the left vs. the right visual field. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):304. doi: 10.1167/6.6.304.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Results from previous studies indicate that the magnitude of attention effects depends on stimulus features/task (e.g., Lee et al, 1997; Morrone et al, 2002). Here, we used a full/poor attention paradigm to investigate attention effects on two different stimuli/tasks: direction of motion and orientation discrimination. Data were obtained for central (CVF), left (LVF) and right visual field (RVF) to see if attention effects vary across space.

Methods: On the motion task, subjects reported direction of a moving dot field (“left” vs. “right”). On the orientation task, subjects reported the tilt of a 0.8 cpd contrast grating (“clockwise” vs. “counterclockwise”). Stimuli subtended 5 degrees, and RVF and LVF stimuli were centered 5 degrees eccentric to fixation. Thresholds were obtained in two conditions: 1) Full Attention: Subjects performed a single-task, reporting direction (or orientation), and 2) Poor Attention: Subjects performed a dual-task, first counting the number of closed shapes at the fixation point, then reporting stimulus direction (or orientation). Attention effects were calculated as Thrpoor/Thrfull.

Results: For orientation, attention effects were constant across space (LVF=1.29, CVF=1.45, RVF=1.20). However, for motion, attention effects varied across space (LVF=1.74, CVF=1.41, RVF=1.07; p=0.002). The difference between the LVF and RVF was driven by lower thresholds in the LVF under full attention (1.2-fold, p=0.045), yet higher thresholds in the LVF under poor attention (1.3-fold, p=0.006).

Conclusions: The different attention effects for RVF vs. LVF motion suggest that attentional resources for motion may be enhanced in the RVF (perhaps from learning to read left-to-right, see Rayner 1998).

Feeney, J. A. Dobkins, K. R. (2006). Attention effects on motion processing are larger in the left vs. the right visual field [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):304, 304a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/304/, doi:10.1167/6.6.304.
Footnotes
 Supported by NSF BCS-0241557 (KRD)
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×