June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
Does contrast reversal affect the recognition of common objects?
Author Affiliations
  • Jessie J. Peissig
    Brown University
  • Quoc C. Vuong
    Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
  • Jean M. Vettel
    Brown University
  • Michael J. Tarr
    Brown University
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 319. doi:10.1167/6.6.319
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jessie J. Peissig, Quoc C. Vuong, Jean M. Vettel, Michael J. Tarr; Does contrast reversal affect the recognition of common objects?. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):319. doi: 10.1167/6.6.319.

      Download citation file:

      © 2016 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

  • Supplements

Previous research has shown that faces are difficult to recognize when viewed in reverse contrast (Galper, 1970). In a prior study, we demonstrated that this effect can be found with a set of novel objects (Greebles; Vuong et al. 2005), and that the effect was significantly greater for both faces and novel objects with pigment as opposed to those without pigment. This suggests that surface properties are integral in the representation of both faces and objects. However, it is an open question as to whether surface properties play the same role in the recognition of common objects which are not face-like. In addition, objects and faces shown in normal contrast are on average higher in luminance than those shown in reverse contrast. Here, we normalized all images to be equiluminant to eliminate this possible confound. We tested observers in a same/different sequential-matching task using gray scale images of common objects (cars and birds) as well as faces. Replicating prior results, faces were significantly more difficult to recognize when shown in reverse contrast. Importantly, we also found a contrast effect for the common objects; this effect was the same magnitude as the face contrast effect. These results indicate that performance costs associated with contrast reversal are not due to overall luminance differences between normal and reverse contrast images. Additionally, these data suggest that surfaces properties play a similar role in the recognition of all object types, not just those that are biological or face-like.

Peissig, J. J. Vuong, Q. C. Vettel, J. M. Tarr, M. J. (2006). Does contrast reversal affect the recognition of common objects? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):319, 319a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/319/, doi:10.1167/6.6.319. [CrossRef]
 This research was paid for by a grant from the National Science Foundation (award # BCS-0339122).

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.