June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
Multi-sensory comparison improves signal discrimination
Author Affiliations
  • Ansgar Koene
    University College London, Psychology Department, London, UK
  • Derek Arnold
    University of Sydney, Department of Psychology, Sydney, Australia
  • Alan Johnston
    University College London, Psychology Department, London, UK, and University College London, CoMPLEX, London, UK
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 384. doi:10.1167/6.6.384
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ansgar Koene, Derek Arnold, Alan Johnston; Multi-sensory comparison improves signal discrimination. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):384. doi: 10.1167/6.6.384.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

We asked whether a multi-modal signal provides benefits in discrimination performance over and above that afforded by having two samples. Observers judged whether the frequency of a sinusoidal amplitude-modulated 3kHz tone and/or Gaussian blob was greater or less than 10Hz. The signals were embedded in additive band-limited white noise centered on 10Hz. There were 6 conditions in which judgments were based on: single visual (1) or auditory (2) stimuli; simultaneous (3) or sequential bi-modal (4) stimuli (random order) or repeated visual (5) or auditory (6) stimuli. External noise amplitude was adjusted such that performance in conditions 1 and 2 was the same. In conditions 3–6 the signal in both repetitions/modalities was the same while the added noise was independent.

Conditions 3 & 4 tested whether bi-modal effects require simultaneous bi-modal presentation. Conditions 5 & 6 tested whether performance improved when information was presented twice in the same modality. We found 1. frequency discrimination improved when stimuli were presented in two modalities; 2. performance improvement did not require simultaneous presentation in both modalities; 3. repeated stimulation in the same modality did not improve discrimination performance. In a separate detection experiment we found no difference between bi-modal and uni-modal repetitions. There was no difference between adding further noise to the first or second paired item demonstrating that both repeated items had equal weight. These results suggest that a-modal signal properties (e.g. amplitude modulation rate) are evaluated by a process of within-modality signal discrimination followed by weighted averaging of the uni-modal estimates.

Koene, A. Arnold, D. Johnston, A. (2006). Multi-sensory comparison improves signal discrimination [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):384, 384a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/384/, doi:10.1167/6.6.384. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×