June 2006
Volume 6, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2006
On the computational elements of visual surface perception
Author Affiliations
  • Hiroshige Takeichi
    RIKEN, IML, the University of Tokyo, and KARC, NICT
Journal of Vision June 2006, Vol.6, 729. doi:10.1167/6.6.729
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hiroshige Takeichi; On the computational elements of visual surface perception. Journal of Vision 2006;6(6):729. doi: 10.1167/6.6.729.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The computation of visual surface perception is not well documented, mainly because of the complex interactions between its phenomenological components, such as illusory contour, transparency, occlusion, and stereopsis. Here it is hypothesized that these phenomenological elements for visual surface perception are compound phenomena that consist of three computational elements. 1. Contour delineation: If a set of features satisfy a relation that is invariant or preserved under projection, the features appear grouped, as they are likely to constitute the image of an object. Shape is a view-invariant and therefore intrinsic property of an object. Thus, recognizable shape features and elements should be preserved under projection. 2. Optics estimation: The optics estimation process is a scission or splitting of the intensity of a pixel into components. Components are surfaces, cast shadows, illumination, and cast lights. While shape is a view-invariant property in the contour delineation process, reflectance and transmittance are view-invariant properties in the optics estimation process. 3. Depth stratification: By detecting a multiple match or a binocularly-unpaired region, one identifies a location where multiple depth values must be assigned to one direction of sight. If the identified depths or local luminance contrasts are consistent along a contour, they lead to the perception of a visual surface. An advantage in the computational decomposition is simplification of inter-module interactions. The adequacy of the hypothesis can be tested empirically through variations of the depth propagation effect (Perception, 21, 177), and theoretically in ecological optics.

Takeichi, H. (2006). On the computational elements of visual surface perception [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):729, 729a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/729/, doi:10.1167/6.6.729. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Supported by MEXT and JST.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×