June 2007
Volume 7, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2007
The effects of optical magnification/minimization on distance estimation by stationary and walking observers
Author Affiliations
  • Jennifer Campos
    Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University
  • Patricia Freitas
    Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University
  • Emma Turner
    Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University
  • Michael Wong
    Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University
  • Hong-Jin Sun
    Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University
Journal of Vision June 2007, Vol.7, 1028. doi:10.1167/7.9.1028
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jennifer Campos, Patricia Freitas, Emma Turner, Michael Wong, Hong-Jin Sun; The effects of optical magnification/minimization on distance estimation by stationary and walking observers. Journal of Vision 2007;7(9):1028. doi: 10.1167/7.9.1028.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

When moving through space, both optic flow and locomotor (proprioceptive/efference copy, vestibular) information can be used to judge the extent of a traveled distance. To better understand how each of these cues is used to estimate the magnitude of self-motion, it is important to dissociate the relative contributions of each when both are available in natural, cue-rich environments. This study created a conflict between visual and locomotor distance cues by either magnifying (2.0×) or minimizing (0.5×) the information contained in the optic array using spectacle-mounted lenses. The experiment took place in a large, open, outdoor field with few landmarks in the distant periphery. Subjects viewed a static target in the distance (6, 8, 10, 12m) and reproduced this distance by walking. Three optical manipulations (OMs: 2.0×, 1.0×, 0.5×) occurred either: A) during the initially learned visual preview, B) during the walked response, or C) during both learning and responding (same OM in each phase). When wearing the 2.0× lenses during the visual preview subjects produced estimates that were shorter than those produced when wearing the 1.0× lenses. The reverse effect was observed for the 0.5× lenses (significantly longer). Although these under/overestimations of static visual distance are significant in the predicted direction, the magnitude of the effect is less than expected considering the specifications of the lenses. In contrast, when the OM occurred during the walked response there were no lens-related effects, thus suggesting a reliance on locomotor cues. When the OM occurred during both learning and responding, lens-related effects were again observed in the expected directions, although were not as strong as when the OM occurred during the visual preview alone. Overall, the results suggest that locomotor information can be used effectively to reproduce a learned visual distance and appears to be the dominant cue when walking with magnified/minimized optic flow.

Campos, J. Freitas, P. Turner, E. Wong, M. Sun, H.-J. (2007). The effects of optical magnification/minimization on distance estimation by stationary and walking observers [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):1028, 1028a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/1028/, doi:10.1167/7.9.1028. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 This work was supported by NSERC and CFI grants to HJS and an NSERC fellowship to JLC.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×