June 2007
Volume 7, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2007
Conceptual Masking: Is it really all about the concept or does layout matter?
Author Affiliations
  • Kristin O. Michod
    The University of Delaware
  • Helene Intraub
    The University of Delaware
Journal of Vision June 2007, Vol.7, 191. doi:10.1167/7.9.191
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kristin O. Michod, Helene Intraub; Conceptual Masking: Is it really all about the concept or does layout matter?. Journal of Vision 2007;7(9):191. doi: 10.1167/7.9.191.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The onset of a new, meaningful visual event is thought to induce conceptual masking (Potter, 1976). Does layout contribute to the ““meaning”” of a scene? Given the same objects, would changes in layout induce conceptual masking? In Experiment 1, each of 16 photographs (the targets) was presented for 125 ms, interspersed with a to-be-ignored photograph for 250 ms (the “conceptual mask”) and a visual noise mask for 500 ms. Each conceptual mask contained the same background with a new set of 3 objects, however, in one condition (N = 32) the objects were always presented in the same layout, whereas in the other, they appeared in a different layout each time (N =32). Following presentation, a 2AFC test was administered, in which each target photograph was paired with a similar distractor (same concept, different details). Although the conceptual mask contained the same new objects in both conditions, recognition memory decreased significantly with a changing layout (80% vs. 70%; t(62) = 3.10, p [[lt]] .01). In Experiment 2, more complex conceptual masks were presented. There were 4 conceptual mask conditions (N = 40 in each): a) different objects/same layout, b) different objects/different layout c) same objects/different layout and d) same objects/same layout (i.e., a repeating picture). Conceptual masking is limited or non-existent when the same mask repeats (Intraub, 1984). In comparison to the repeating picture condition (78% recognized), orthogonal planned comparisons showed that memory decreased significantly when the conceptual mask changed each time: different objects/same layout (72%), different objects/different layout (70%), or same objects/different layout (74%). Thus, even when gist was maintained (same objects; same background), layout changes interfered with memory for the attended pictures. Both experiments demonstrate that conceptual masking involves more than the onset of a new global concept; a new layout also disrupts processing of briefly presented scenes.

Michod, K. O. Intraub, H. (2007). Conceptual Masking: Is it really all about the concept or does layout matter? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):191, 191a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/191/, doi:10.1167/7.9.191. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 NIMH Grant MH54688
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×