June 2007
Volume 7, Issue 9
Meeting Abstract  |   June 2007
Mondrian, eye movements, and the oblique effect
Author Affiliations
  • James Schirillo
    Wake Forest University
Journal of Vision June 2007, Vol.7, 26. doi:10.1167/7.9.26
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      James Schirillo; Mondrian, eye movements, and the oblique effect. Journal of Vision 2007;7(9):26. doi: 10.1167/7.9.26.

      Download citation file:

      © 2015 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

  • Supplements

Observers prefer paintings by Mondrian in their original orientation compared to when rotated - “The Oblique Effect” (Latto, et. al., 2000). We tested whether eye movements provide any insight into this aesthetic bias. We presented 8 Mondrian paintings (1921–1944) on a CRT in either their original or seven rotated positions to 10 observers. These 64 images were presented pseudo-randomly for 20 sec each while recording eye movement fixation duration and saccade length. During the 5 sec ISI observers used a 1–7 Likert-scale to report how (dis)pleasing they found each image. In 6 cases an original orientation was judged as significantly more pleasing that a rotated image, while a rotated image was preferred in 3 cases. Overall, over the 20 sec trial interval, fixation durations increased linearly, where pleasing images fixation duration increased more than non-pleasing images. Moreover, saccade distances oscillated over the viewing interval; with the pleasing image fit being more variable (i.e., saccade distance oscillations were larger) than the non-pleasing image fit. Both these findings agree with earlier work by Nodine, Lochear and colleague; and suggest that the more pleasing an abstract painting is, the greater the diversive/specific types of image exploration become (Berlyne, 1971).

Schirillo, J. (2007). Mondrian, eye movements, and the oblique effect [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):26, 26a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/26/, doi:10.1167/7.9.26. [CrossRef]
© 2007 ARVO

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.