June 2007
Volume 7, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2007
Lines and dipoles are efficiently detected
Author Affiliations
  • Albert Ahumada
    Human Systems Interface Division, NASA Ames Research Center
  • Lauren Scharff
    Psychology Department, Stephen F. Austin State University
Journal of Vision June 2007, Vol.7, 337. doi:10.1167/7.9.337
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Albert Ahumada, Lauren Scharff; Lines and dipoles are efficiently detected. Journal of Vision 2007;7(9):337. doi: 10.1167/7.9.337.

      Download citation file:

      © 2016 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

  • Supplements

Watson, Barlow, & Robson (1983 Nature) rated patterns by contrast energy threshold and found a 7 cpd Gabor to be best. Watson (2000 Optics Express) plotted the contrast energy thresholds for the 43 Modelfest stimuli and found a Gaussian spot with a standard deviation (SD) of 2.1 arc min was best. When he compensated for contrast sensitivity, the best spot was the smallest one (SD = 1.05 min) and the overall best stimulus was the “one octave” (window SD = 2.1 min) 16 cpd Gabor. When he accounted for spatial summation in addition to contrast sensitivity, the spots and the Gabors were similar in performance and the best stimulus (but not significantly different) was the long (window SD = 30 min), narrow (1 pixel = 0.5 min) line. Using Modelfest-like methods, we have measured the detectability of lines as a function of length (2, 6, 18, 54 min) and width (0.5, 1, 2 min) and also have compared the detectability of lines (8 × 0.5 min) with that of dipoles (2 adjacent 8 × 0.5 min lines of equal and opposite contrast). We found that short lines can have contrast energy thresholds as low as those of spots, and that when contrast sensitivity is taken into account, dipole thresholds can be as low as those of lines. We also found that the introduction of fixation marks close to the small patterns could lower the thresholds as much as 3 dB, suggesting that spatial uncertainty may have played an important role in the detection of small patterns in the Modelfest experiments.

Ahumada, A. Scharff, L. (2007). Lines and dipoles are efficiently detected [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):337, 337a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/337/, doi:10.1167/7.9.337. [CrossRef]
 Supported by FAA/NASA DTFA-2045, NASA Airspace Systems, and the San Jose State University Foundation.

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.