June 2007
Volume 7, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   June 2007
Size differences improve tracking in MOT, but only when the size of targets/nontargets changes as a group
Author Affiliations
  • Harry Haladjian
    Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, New Brunswick, NJ and Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
  • Zenon Pylyshyn
    Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, New Brunswick, NJ
Journal of Vision June 2007, Vol.7, 900. doi:10.1167/7.9.900
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Harry Haladjian, Zenon Pylyshyn; Size differences improve tracking in MOT, but only when the size of targets/nontargets changes as a group. Journal of Vision 2007;7(9):900. doi: 10.1167/7.9.900.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

In a previous report (VSS 2002), we found no differences in tracking performance on MOT between “asynchronous” conditions (where objects changed colors smoothly and at the same time so that no two objects were ever the same color) and “synchronous” conditions (where objects changed colors in the same way but in synchrony so that objects were always the same color) see also Klieger et al. (VSS 2004). However, a different result might be obtained if the object property were more “spatial”, or if it segregated targets and nontargets as a group. In this study, we manipulated object size in a way that produced a perception of looming and receding. Subjects tracked four independently-moving target circles among four identical distractors for 5 or 10 seconds in four conditions where objects changed size (1) synchronously, or (2) asynchronously. In addition, we added two “segregated” conditions where targets expanded or shrank smoothly to a fixed size: (3) 138% of the nontarget size, or (4) 62% of the nontarget size. In conditions (3) and (4) targets and nontargets could easily be distinguished during the midpart of the trial by their different size (but not at the beginning or end when they were the same size). Since conditions (3) and (4) constituted only 16.5% of the trials presented at random, we reasoned that subjects might not notice the correlation of object size with targethood. As with the earlier color study, tracking performance in both synchronous and asynchronous conditions was the same for 5-second trials (84% correct) and 10-second trials (77% correct). However, segregating targets and nontargets by size yielded consistently better tracking (93% correct), which was the same for both 5-second and 10-second trial durations. This suggests that spatially-perceived properties may be used in tracking to help discriminate between targets and nontargets.

Haladjian, H. Pylyshyn, Z. (2007). Size differences improve tracking in MOT, but only when the size of targets/nontargets changes as a group [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):900, 900a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/900/, doi:10.1167/7.9.900. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×