December 2007
Volume 7, Issue 15
Free
Meeting Abstract  |   December 2007
Estimation of L: M Cone Ratio from ERG, Adaptive Optics, and Color Naming Methods
Author Affiliations
  • Jesson Martin
    Medical College of Wisconsin
  • Adam Dubis
    Medical College of Wisconsin
  • Joseph Carroll
    Medical College of Wisconsin
  • John Krauskopf
    Center for Neural Science, NYU
Journal of Vision December 2007, Vol.7, 81. doi:10.1167/7.15.81
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jesson Martin, Adam Dubis, Joseph Carroll, John Krauskopf; Estimation of L: M Cone Ratio from ERG, Adaptive Optics, and Color Naming Methods. Journal of Vision 2007;7(15):81. doi: 10.1167/7.15.81.

      Download citation file:


      © 2015 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

      ×
  • Supplements

The relative proportion of L and M cones is remarkably variable among humans. Here we present estimates of L: M cone ratios of 8 male subjects using a new method based on the color appearance of small spots of light to which L and M cones have been found to be equally sensitive (Iso_LM stimuli). The Iso_LM stimuli were determined by application of the Stiles two-color increment threshold procedure. The new estimates of the L:M ratios are compared with ones previously made on these subjects using flicker photometric ERG and adaptive optics. In addition, we obtained measurements of unique yellow and genetically characterized each subject's L and M cone pigments. We find a significant difference in Iso_LM between individuals with different L photopigment variants, consistent with it being determined simply by the pigment sensitivity; however the absolute position of Iso_LM deviated from that predicted from a simple model of photopigment sensitivity, suggesting the presence of a gain within the M-cone pathway. Further analysis reveals limited correlation between the ERG/AO estimates and those derived from the psychophysical technique, with the psychophysical technique consistently underestimating the L: M ratio derived from the ERG/AO. However, there does appear to be significant variability between subjects with all three techniques, consistent with a shared physiological origin.

Martin, J. Dubis, A. Carroll, J. Krauskopf, J. (2007). Estimation of L: M Cone Ratio from ERG, Adaptive Optics, and Color Naming Methods [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(15):81, 81a, http://journalofvision.org/7/15/81/, doi:10.1167/7.15.81. [CrossRef]
© 2007 ARVO
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×