December 2008
Volume 8, Issue 17
Free
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   December 2008
Comparison of local versus lateral S-cone modulation on rod thresholds
Author Affiliations
  • Rigmor C. Baraas
    Department of Optometry and Visual Science, Buskerud University College, Kongsberg, Norway
  • Hao Sun
    Department of Optometry and Visual Science, Buskerud University College, Kongsberg, Norway
Journal of Vision December 2008, Vol.8, 11. doi:10.1167/8.17.11
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Rigmor C. Baraas, Hao Sun; Comparison of local versus lateral S-cone modulation on rod thresholds. Journal of Vision 2008;8(17):11. doi: 10.1167/8.17.11.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Rod and S-cone signals have been shown to interact in an additive manner at threshold. S-cone ganglion cells receive color-opponent input without center-surround antagonistic structure, which is unlike ganglion cells that receive color-opponent input from L- and M-cones. Interaction between rods and S-cones may therefore depend on whether rod and S-cone modulation covers the same spatial location (local) or different spatial locations (lateral) (see review by Buck 2004).

Here, rod thresholds were measured at different phases for a rod pulse superimposed on an S-cone sinusoidally-modulated background. Rod and S-cone isolating stimuli (silent substitution) were generated with a 2-channel 4-primary Maxwellian view system. Detection thresholds for a 100-ms 1-deg rod-isolating pulse were measured against one of four possible adapting backgrounds: 1) a 12-deg steady full-field, 2) a 1-deg cone-modulating field (local), 3) a 12-deg cone-modulating annulus with a 1-deg inner diameter (lateral) or 4) a 12-deg cone-modulating full-field (local and lateral together) (Lee, Decay, Smith & Pokorny, 1999). The cone modulation was a temporal sinusoid along the S axis and did not modulate rods. The stimulus was presented 6-deg extra-foveal (nasal) at 200 Td and 20 Td.

Results show that, at 200 Td, rod thresholds varied with phase in a systematic way for all conditions tested. At 20 Td, however, the variation with phase was only observed for the full-field condition. This suggests that the spatial configuration of the adapting background affects the type of interaction observed, but differently to what is seen for rod and L-/M-cone interaction.

BuckS. (2004). Rod-Cone Interactions in Human Vision. In ChalupaL. M.WernerJ. S. (Eds.), The Visual Neurosciences Vol. 1 (pp. 863–878). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

LeeB.B.DaceyD.M.SmithV.C.PokornyJ. (1999). Horizontal cells reveal cone type-specific adaptation in primate retina. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 14611–14616.

Baraas, R. C. Sun, H. (2008). Comparison of local versus lateral S-cone modulation on rod thresholds [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(17):11, 11a, http://journalofvision.org/8/17/11/, doi:10.1167/8.17.11. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Supported by the Norwegian Research Council Grant No.176541/V10 and 182768/V10.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×