December 2008
Volume 8, Issue 17
Free
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   December 2008
Minimally distinct borders in mesopic vision
Author Affiliations
  • Sabine Raphael
    University of California at San Diego, CA & University of Paderborn, Germany
  • Donald I. A. MacLeod
    University of California at San Diego, CA
Journal of Vision December 2008, Vol.8, 75. doi:10.1167/8.17.75
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sabine Raphael, Donald I. A. MacLeod; Minimally distinct borders in mesopic vision. Journal of Vision 2008;8(17):75. doi: 10.1167/8.17.75.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The distinctness of the border between two adjacent fields is minimized when the fields are of equal luminance as defined by the CIE photopic standard observer (V(?)) in the photopic brightness range (Boynton, Kaiser, 1968; Wagner, Boynton 1972; Kaiser, 1971). We used minimally distinct border (MDB) matches between a constant reference and a varying comparison field under parafoveal photopic, mesopic, and scotopic conditions to assess changes in the relative contribution of rods and cones. The border criterion was compared with minimum motion settings under similar conditions (Cavanagh, MacLeod, Anstis, 1987).

A linear combination of scotopic and photopic luminance signals according to CIE V'(λ) and V(λ) functions can account for the results of both methods. There is no evidence that opponent signals or S cone responses are involved.

The criteria of minimally distinct border and minimum motion lead for one observer to similar results with a transition luminance (luminance of equal rod and cone weights) of 0.05 cd/m2. However the MDB data of the second observer show a steeper transition at a lower luminance than the minimum motion criterion would suggest. Overall the minimum motion results of the two tested observers show a good agreement over the tested luminance range while MDB matches differ strongly between observers.

A reversed Purkinje shift is observed at the highest light level tested (42 cd/m2) for MDB, shown by a decrease in sensitivity for red stimuli, which is not visible in the minimum motion data.

WagnerG.BoyntonR. M. (1972). Comparison of four methods of heterochromatic photometry. JOSA, 62(12).

BoyntonR. M.KaiserP. K. (1968). Vision: the additivity law made to work for heterochromatic photometry with bipartite fields. Science, 161(839), 366–368.

KaiserP. K. (1971). Minimally distinct border as a preferred psychophysical criterion in visual heterochromatic photometry. JOSA, 61(7), 966–971

CavanaghP.MacLeodD. I. A.AnstisS. M. (1987). Equiluminance: spatial and temporal factors and the contribution of blue-sensitive cones. JOSA A, 4(8).

Raphael, S. MacLeod, D. I. A. (2008). Minimally distinct borders in mesopic vision [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(17):75, 75a, http://journalofvision.org/8/17/75/, doi:10.1167/8.17.75. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 This research was funded by Grant No. DAAD D/07/50125 and NIH EY01711.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×