August 2009
Volume 9, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2009
A comparison of the pedestal effects in the 1st- and 2nd-order patterns
Author Affiliations
  • Pi-Chun Huang
    Psychology Department, National Taiwan University
  • Chien-Chung Chen
    Psychology Department, National Taiwan University
Journal of Vision August 2009, Vol.9, 1011. doi:10.1167/9.8.1011
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Pi-Chun Huang, Chien-Chung Chen; A comparison of the pedestal effects in the 1st- and 2nd-order patterns. Journal of Vision 2009;9(8):1011. doi: 10.1167/9.8.1011.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose. Human visual system is sensitive to both luminance (the first-order) modulations and contrast (the second-order) modulations in an image. A linear-nonlinear-linear (LNL) model is commonly used to explain the visual process of the 2nd-order stimuli. Here we used pattern masking paradigm to compare the 1st-order and the 2nd-order visual mechanisms and to characterize the nonlinear properties of their underlying mechanisms. Methods. The stimuli were a high frequency horizontal grating (8 cyc/d) either added to (1st-order stimuli) or multiplied with (2nd-order stimuli) a vertical low frequency (2 cyc/d) Gabor function. The discrimination threshold of the target was measured with pedestals whose spatial properties as that of the target except contrast (1st-order pedestal) or modulation depth (2nd-order pedestal) of either the low or the high frequency components. Results. The threshold function showed a typical dipper shape for both the 1st- and the 2nd-order stimuli: the threshold first decreased (facilitation) and then increased (suppression) with pedestal contrast or modulation depth. The results for the 1st-order stimuli were well explained by divisive inhibition model in which the facilitatory input was divided by the sum of broadband inhibitory inputs. The results for the 2nd-order stimuli were also well explained by a modified that operated on modulation depth rather than contrast in the input images. Conclusion. Our result suggests that divisive inhibition is required to explain visual discrimination in both the first- and the second-order patterns. However, the source and the nonlinearity of the divisive inhibition may be different for these two types of patterns.

Huang, P.-C. Chen, C.-C. (2009). A comparison of the pedestal effects in the 1st- and 2nd-order patterns [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8):1011, 1011a, http://journalofvision.org/9/8/1011/, doi:10.1167/9.8.1011. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Supported by NSC 96-2413-H-002-006-MY3 and NSC 097-2811-H-002-005- to CCC.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×