August 2009
Volume 9, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2009
A contrast polarity search effect in letter identification
Author Affiliations
  • Lauren Scharff
    Stephen F. Austin State University
  • Albert Ahumada
    NASA Ames Research Center
Journal of Vision August 2009, Vol.9, 1021. doi:10.1167/9.8.1021
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Lauren Scharff, Albert Ahumada; A contrast polarity search effect in letter identification. Journal of Vision 2009;9(8):1021. doi: 10.1167/9.8.1021.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Contrast polarity effects have been ascribed to the negative polarity system being more sensitive and having higher spatial resolution. Higher cell density for negative polarity ganglion cells has been found in Macaque peripheral parasol cells. We repeated the letter identification task we presented here last year, adding a condition in which the letters were presented in one of four peripheral locations instead of in the central fovea. Single letters of positive or negative polarity were either presented normally or as background gray letters surrounded by a small positive or negative pedestal. The pedestal polarity determined the channel polarity, opposite the apparent polarity of the pedestal-defined letter. Response latencies were collected from 16 observers for 3 repetitions of 12 letters presented randomly at 6 letter or pedestal contrasts (+/−0.4, +/−0.2, +/−0.1) and at two eccentricities (0 and 3 degrees). For the foveal presentations, only the absolute amount of contrast significantly affected the latencies. Peripheral presentations led to slower latencies overall, and for the highest contrast peripheral conditions neither contrast polarity nor pedestal vs. letter mattered. At the lowest contrast, there again was no polarity effect, but the pedestal condition was much faster than the letter condition, the increased stimulus area of the pedestal apparently guiding fixations better. At the middle contrast level, the positive contrast letters were slowest to be identified. This could be the result of poorer fixation guidance or smaller letter span by the positive polarity system.

Scharff, L. Ahumada, A. (2009). A contrast polarity search effect in letter identification [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8):1021, 1021a, http://journalofvision.org/9/8/1021/, doi:10.1167/9.8.1021. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×