August 2009
Volume 9, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2009
Dissociations between perceived and actual success in goal-directed movements
Author Affiliations
  • Holly E Gerhard
    Department of Psychology, New York University
  • Wolfe Uta
    Department of Psychology, Hobart and William Smith Colleges
  • Laurence T Maloney
    Department of Psychology, New York University, and Center for Neural Science, New York University
Journal of Vision August 2009, Vol.9, 1105. doi:10.1167/9.8.1105
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Holly E Gerhard, Wolfe Uta, Laurence T Maloney; Dissociations between perceived and actual success in goal-directed movements. Journal of Vision 2009;9(8):1105. doi: 10.1167/9.8.1105.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose. Last year, we developed an experiment intended as a very simple model of injury or stroke in which the subject, after first practicing a speeded touching movement, was required to perform the movement but with their elbow physically constrained. We found that subjects' objective performance suffered little and recovered quickly after constraint but that their predictions of success decreased markedly and remained depressed. Moreover, when the constraint was removed, subjects continued to underestimate their actual success. Typical explanations for this “dissociation” between performance and perceived performance emphasize the awkwardness of the constrained movement. Here we examine if similar effects occur after moving with the non-dominant hand. Methods. Participants (n=8) made fast reaches (35 cm, 250ms) with their index finger to touch a target (circular, 0.4 cm) on a horizontal touchscreen. Before each trial, participants estimated their chances (0–100%) of hitting the target. Participants performed three blocks: B1) 40 trials with dominant hand, B2) 30 trials, non-dominant hand, and B3) 30 trials, dominant hand. Analysis. We calculated within-subject averages of endpoint errors in the last 20 trials of each block to estimate the objective probability Oi of hitting the target at asymptotic performance in Bi. We averaged subjective estimates over the same ranges to obtain corresponding subjective probabilities Si. Results. Statistical tests indicated that O1>O2<O3 and S1>S2<S3 : participants showed lower accuracy and lower estimates for the non-dominant hand. Unlike the estimates following the joint constraint, participants' estimates for the dominant hand rapidly recovered after moving with the non-dominant hand. Conclusions. Restraining the arm's degrees of freedom leads to a pronounced, erroneous decrease in perceived motor performance that persists after constraint removal. However, an aftereffect was not found after moving with the non-dominant hand, so it cannot be a simple residual effect of perceiving one's performance on non-routine movements as awkward.

Gerhard, H. E. Uta, W. Maloney, L. T. (2009). Dissociations between perceived and actual success in goal-directed movements [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8):1105, 1105a, http://journalofvision.org/9/8/1105/, doi:10.1167/9.8.1105. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Support: NIH NS047178-01A1 (UW), NIH EY08266 (LTM).
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×