August 2009
Volume 9, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2009
What causes IOR and contingent capture?
Author Affiliations
  • William Prinzmetal
    University of California, Berkeley
  • Ruby Ha
    University of California, Berkeley
Journal of Vision August 2009, Vol.9, 115. doi:10.1167/9.8.115
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      William Prinzmetal, Ruby Ha; What causes IOR and contingent capture?. Journal of Vision 2009;9(8):115. doi: 10.1167/9.8.115.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The involuntary attention effect is the finding of faster RT to identify targets presented in a cued than uncued location even when the cue location is random with respect to the target location. We proposed that there are at least two separate mechanisms responsible for involuntary attention: (1) a serial search mechanism that accounts for performance when the target is difficult to locate, and (2) a decision mechanism that accounts for performance when the target is easy to locate. The serial model predicts that as the number of possible target locations increases, the cueing effect increases. The decision model makes the opposite prediction.

We previously demonstrated that when the target is easy to locate, in the absence of distractors in the display, the decision model accounts for the involuntary attention effect. However, when the target is made difficult to locate by presenting distractors with the target, the serial model accounts for the involuntary attention effect (Prinzmetal & Ha, 2008).

Here, we investigated two findings associated with involuntary attention: (1) IOR (inhibition of return) is the finding that when the cue-target interval is relatively long, observers are slower to identify targets in the cued than in the uncued location. (2) Contingent capture is the finding that the involuntary attention effect is larger when the cue and target are similar than when they are not similar.

We obtained IOR only when there were no distractors in the display. IOR was larger with 2 than 6 possible target locations. Thus IOR is better described by the decision mechanisms. We obtained contingent capture only when there were distractors, and the effect was larger with 6 than 2 locations. Contingent capture is due to a serial mechanism. Hence there are at least two separate mechanisms responsible for involuntary attention.

Prinzmetal, W. Ha, R. (2009). What causes IOR and contingent capture? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8):115, 115a, http://journalofvision.org/9/8/115/, doi:10.1167/9.8.115. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×