August 2009
Volume 9, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2009
On boundary contour and center-surround factors in binocular rivalry
Author Affiliations
  • Teng Leng Ooi
    Salus University, USA
  • Yong Su
    Salus University, USA, and University of Louisville, USA
  • Jingping Xu
    University of Louisville, USA
  • Zijiang He
    University of Louisville, USA
Journal of Vision August 2009, Vol.9, 306. doi:10.1167/9.8.306
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Teng Leng Ooi, Yong Su, Jingping Xu, Zijiang He; On boundary contour and center-surround factors in binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision 2009;9(8):306. doi: 10.1167/9.8.306.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Boundary contour information that defines surface regions can affect binocular rivalry (BR). A vertical grating disc surrounded by a horizontal grating half-image competing with a horizontal grating half-image leads to a high predominance for seeing the disc. This is attributable to either the monocular boundary contour (MBC) defining the disc, or the feature difference (vertical vs. horizontal) between the center (disc) and surround regions. Experiment-1 investigated this by measuring contrast threshold of a Gabor probe in three conditions with variously specified MBC. (1) MBC-condition: one half-image had a vertical MBC disc (1.5deg) created by a 90deg phase-shift relative to the surrounding vertical grating and the other half-image had a homogeneous vertical grating (2.2cpd, 1.5log%, 60cd/m2). (2) Ring-condition: a white ring (121.2cd/m2, 0.045deg thick), instead of the phase-shift, defined the MBC. (3) MBC+Ring condition: the same white ring encircled the phase-shifted disc. For all three conditions we found thresholds were lower on the half-image with the MBC than on the homogeneous grating half-image, indicating binocular suppression. Critically, since the Ring-condition carries only MBC, this suggests that MBC alone can lead to dominance. Experiment-2 measured BR predominance of a vertical grating disc surrounded by horizontal grating in one half-image and a horizontal grating disk created by phase-shifting it relative to the surrounding horizontal grating in the other half-image. Confirming our previous findings (Xu et al, 2006), the predominance for seeing the horizontal grating disc increased with increasing phase-shift that strengthened the boundary contour of the horizontal disc and enhanced the center-surround difference. We then added a white ring (35 cd/m2, 0.04deg thick) to encircle the phase-shifted horizontal disc. We found that with the ring, the predominance for seeing the horizontal grating remained unchanged with increasing phase-shift. This suggests that the center-surround factor contributes less to BR than the boundary contour factor.

Ooi, T. L. Su, Y. Xu, J. He, Z. (2009). On boundary contour and center-surround factors in binocular rivalry [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8):306, 306a, http://journalofvision.org/9/8/306/, doi:10.1167/9.8.306. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Supported by a grant from the NIH (R01 EY015804).
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×