August 2009
Volume 9, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2009
Retaining the McCollough effect: Is sleep = lack of visual exposure?
Author Affiliations
  • Greg Whittaker
    University of Houston
  • Huy Nguyen
    University of Houston
  • Scott Stevenson
    College of Optometry, University of Houston
  • Bhavin Sheth
    Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Houston, and Center for NeuroEngineering and Cognitive Sciences, University of Houston
Journal of Vision August 2009, Vol.9, 317. doi:10.1167/9.8.317
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Greg Whittaker, Huy Nguyen, Scott Stevenson, Bhavin Sheth; Retaining the McCollough effect: Is sleep = lack of visual exposure?. Journal of Vision 2009;9(8):317. doi: 10.1167/9.8.317.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Earlier (VSS, 2007), we demonstrated that a retention period consisting mainly, but not entirely, of sleep (8 hours sleep+4 hours wake) following sustained exposure to colored oriented stimuli helped retain the resulting aftereffect (McCollough effect) to a greater extent than when they remained awake over the intervening period. The findings raised key questions, which we address here.

i) Does sleep help retain a greater portion of the plasticity via some mechanism unique to sleep? We adapted and tested observers following an ~8 hour long intervening period that consisted almost entirely of sleep (monitored with sleep logs and actigraphy). As a control, the same observers were run on a separate session in which they remained awake throughout a retention period of identical duration as in sleep, but the adapted eye was deprived of visual stimulation. In the sleep condition, observers (n=4 thus far) retained 76% of the original ME, whereas in the wake (visually deprived) condition, the same observers retained 82% of the original ME. Thus, sleep did not impart greater retention of the aftereffect compared with visual deprivation.

ii) Does sleep help retain the ME via some sleep-dependent mechanism that is independent of sheltering the AE from visual exposure? We provided stimulation throughout the night through the closed eyelid of the adapted eye. Stimulation consisted of a continuous, cyclic pattern of flickering LEDs, which gave rise to the percept of a red ganzfeld. A parsimonious account of the role of sleep in AE retention would be one based on (the lack of) visual exposure in sleep: exposure to light in sleep ought to destroy the AE. Three observers thus far have participated. Additional observers will be required to test the prediction. Our results thus far indicate that there is no mechanism unique to sleep that helps retain the visual aftereffect.

Whittaker, G. Nguyen, H. Stevenson, S. Sheth, B. (2009). Retaining the McCollough effect: Is sleep = lack of visual exposure? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8):317, 317a, http://journalofvision.org/9/8/317/, doi:10.1167/9.8.317. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×