August 2009
Volume 9, Issue 8
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2009
Examining object representation via object memory: Exemplar and state-level object properties are supported by the same underlying features
Author Affiliations
  • Timothy F. Brady
    Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, MIT
  • Talia Konkle
    Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, MIT
  • Aude Oliva
    Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, MIT
Journal of Vision August 2009, Vol.9, 814. doi:10.1167/9.8.814
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Timothy F. Brady, Talia Konkle, Aude Oliva; Examining object representation via object memory: Exemplar and state-level object properties are supported by the same underlying features. Journal of Vision 2009;9(8):814. doi: 10.1167/9.8.814.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The properties of any given image of a real-world object (e.g., a phone) are determined both by the particular exemplar of the category it represents, and by which state or pose the exemplar is in. For example, there are many different kinds of phones (exemplar-level information) and any given phone can be on or off the hook (state-level information).

Here, we use an object memory paradigm to examine the separability of these object properties in memory. If object properties can be encoded or decay independently, then we can infer that different high-level features underlie their representations.

12 observers were shown 120 briefly presented objects, and judged the physical size of the objects. Following this task, we gave observers a surprise memory test. To probe which properties of each object were incidentally encoded, a 4-alternative forced choice test display was presented for each object, consisting of two exemplars (one familiar, one novel), each in two states (one familiar, one novel). By modeling these data, we examined how often people remembered only the exemplar-level information or only state-level information.

Using both goodness of fit measures and Bayesian model selection, we examined whether the data were better fit by a model in which these kinds of information were represented independently or together.

Both methods support a model in which these two types of object information are bound together, suggesting that memory for both exemplar- and state-level object properties is supported by the same underlying high-level visual features.

Thus, as both visual long-term memory and object recognition depend on the same high-level object representation, memory errors can usefully inform models of object recognition by elucidating the underlying object representation.

Brady, T. F. Konkle, T. Oliva, A. (2009). Examining object representation via object memory: Exemplar and state-level object properties are supported by the same underlying features [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8):814, 814a, http://journalofvision.org/9/8/814/, doi:10.1167/9.8.814. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Funded by an NSF Graduate Fellowship to T.F.B. and an NDSEG Fellowship to T.K.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×