May 2008
Volume 8, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Pop-out for interocular conflict
Author Affiliations
  • Chris L.E. Paffen
    Helmholtz Institute & Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
  • Ignace T.C. Hooge
    Helmholtz Institute & Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
  • Jeroen S. Benjamins
    Helmholtz Institute & Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
  • Hinze Hoogendoorn
    Helmholtz Institute & Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
Journal of Vision May 2008, Vol.8, 1076. doi:10.1167/8.6.1076
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Chris L.E. Paffen, Ignace T.C. Hooge, Jeroen S. Benjamins, Hinze Hoogendoorn; Pop-out for interocular conflict. Journal of Vision 2008;8(6):1076. doi: 10.1167/8.6.1076.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Outline

Wolfe and Franzel (1988) concluded that an element containing interocular conflict does not ‘pop out’ during visual search. Here we show that this absence of pop out was mainly due to the specific setup used in their experiments and that a target with interocular conflict does pop out during search.

Method

Observers performed a search task on elements either containing interocular conflict (horizontal and vertical orientations) or not. Elements were placed in a circular arrangement centered around the fixation point. Two basic conditions were tested: (1) a conflict target among non-conflict distractors and (2) a non-conflict target among conflict distractors. For each condition we varied set size. A target was present on 50% of the trials. Observers pressed a button indicating that a target was present or absent.

Results The absence of ‘pop-out’ in the Wolfe and Franzel study (1988) was found while presenting left- and right-eye images in alternating sequence at 30 Hz using a shutter arrangement. Using mirrors, we show that ‘pop out’ of interocular conflict does occur when the images are presented simultaneously. Search was faster for a conflict target among non-conflict distractors than for a non-conflict target among conflict distractors. Moreover, search times increased with increasing set-size when searching for the non-conflict target (slope: 120 ms), but were constant when searching for the conflict target (slope: 15 ms). This search asymmetry was not evident when the same stimulus was fused and presented to both eyes without conflict, eliminating the possibility that a feature in the fused percept was responsible for pop-out. In addition, search times did not depend on the alternation rate of the individual (conflict) elements. We conclude that interocular conflict is a pop out feature during visual search.

Wolfe, J.M., & Franzel, S.L. (1988). Binocularity and visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 81-93.

Paffen, C. L. E. Hooge, I. T. C. Benjamins, J. S. Hoogendoorn, H. (2008). Pop-out for interocular conflict [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):1076, 1076a, http://journalofvision.org/8/6/1076/, doi:10.1167/8.6.1076. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×