May 2008
Volume 8, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Little evidence of perceptual depth compression when indicating extents by imagined walking
Author Affiliations
  • Naohide Yamamoto
    George Washington University
  • John W. Philbeck
    George Washington University
Journal of Vision May 2008, Vol.8, 1149. doi:10.1167/8.6.1149
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Naohide Yamamoto, John W. Philbeck; Little evidence of perceptual depth compression when indicating extents by imagined walking. Journal of Vision 2008;8(6):1149. doi: 10.1167/8.6.1149.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

There is a well-known perceptual foreshortening in the depth dimension, even for relatively near distances (e.g., 3–10 m). However, when observers view two markers on the ground and attempt to walk the distance between them with their eyes closed, there is little evidence of foreshortening (Loomis et al., 1992). The present study explored this apparent discrepancy by using imagined walking of exocentric intervals. In an outdoor setting, observers binocularly viewed frontal and depth intervals of 137 cm, presented 3–10 m away; they then attempted to physically pace out the intervals with eyes closed, or imagine performing the same task. Walked distance (real walking only) and walking time (both real and imagined walking) were measured. For comparison, participants also performed a visual matching task in which they attempted to create a depth interval that matched a frontal interval. Results from this matching task showed that depth intervals were made about 40% longer than the corresponding frontal intervals, indicating that these observers showed large depth foreshortening. On the other hand, although walking time was significantly underestimated in imagined walking compared to real walking, both response modes were much more resistant to perceptual depth compression. These results suggest that a similar spatial representation underlies real and imagined walking, which is largely isotropic and dissociable from the anisotropic spatial representation underlying visual perception of exocentric intervals. However, the underestimation of walking time in imagined walking indicates some functional differences between real and imagined walking, conceivably attributable to the lack of self-motion signals during imagined walking.

Yamamoto, N. Philbeck, J. W. (2008). Little evidence of perceptual depth compression when indicating extents by imagined walking [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):1149, 1149a, http://journalofvision.org/8/6/1149/, doi:10.1167/8.6.1149. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Research supported by NIH 5R01NS052137-03.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×