May 2008
Volume 8, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
A taxonomy of visual attention
Author Affiliations
  • William Prinzmetal
    Psychology, University of California, Berkeley
  • Ruby Ha
    Psychology, University of California, Berkeley
Journal of Vision May 2008, Vol.8, 134. doi:10.1167/8.6.134
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      William Prinzmetal, Ruby Ha; A taxonomy of visual attention. Journal of Vision 2008;8(6):134. doi: 10.1167/8.6.134.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

It is widely believed that there are two types of spatial attention: voluntary and involuntary attention. We expand this taxonomy by demonstrating that there are at least two mechanisms of involuntary attention. The first is a serial search mechanism and is related to finding the target in a display. In a spatial cueing task, observers have a tendency to search for the target beginning at the cued location (valid trials). If the target is not at that location, observers then search other locations (invalid trials). Hence RTs are faster on valid than invalid trials. The second mechanism occurs at the response decision stage. A spatial cue primes a response to any stimulus that appears at the cued location. This mechanism can be characterized by a formalism called the accumulator model (Usher & McClelland, 2001). The serial model predicts that as the number of display positions increases, the cueing effect will increase. The accumulator model makes the opposite prediction. In most tasks, observers must both find the target (serial search) and decide which target was present (accumulator model). Which of the two mechanisms will limit performance will depend on whether finding the target or discriminating the target is more difficult. We varied the number display positions in a spatial cueing task. We found that when there were no distractors the cueing effect decreased as the number of display positions increased, supporting the accumulator model. When there were distractors, the cueing effect increased as the number of distractors increased, supporting the serial search model. Thus involuntary attention is mediated by at least two different mechanisms: serial search and response decision. We've begun to explore whether different involuntary attention effects (e.g., inhibition of return, contingent capture) are caused by the serial search or decision (accumulator) mechanisms.

Prinzmetal, W. Ha, R. (2008). A taxonomy of visual attention [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):134, 134a, http://journalofvision.org/8/6/134/, doi:10.1167/8.6.134. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×