May 2008
Volume 8, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
No iconic memory decay nor visual short-term memory decay for grating contrast
Author Affiliations
  • Ling Lin
    UC, Irvine
  • George Sperling
    UC, Irvine
Journal of Vision May 2008, Vol.8, 206. doi:10.1167/8.6.206
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ling Lin, George Sperling; No iconic memory decay nor visual short-term memory decay for grating contrast. Journal of Vision 2008;8(6):206. doi: 10.1167/8.6.206.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Lu, Williamson and Kaufman (Science, 258, 1668–1669, 1992) determined exponential decay constants (between 1–3 sec) for auditory echoic memory for loudness (around 85 dB) of pure sine tones. Their listeners' echoic memories decayed to intermediate auditory memories of the context—the average loudness of all the tones presented in a session—in 2–6 sec, and were maintained for up to 12 sec. We explicitly followed Lu et al's paradigm intending to measure the decay of iconic memory of the contrast amplitude of a visual windowed sinewave grating (a Gabor patch) and also to create (as did Lu et al, 1992) different intermediate-term memories by varying the composition of all the stimuli in the session (context). To a good approximation we found that observers' judgments of relative contrast were as accurate for successive Gabor patches as for simultaneous stimuli, i.e., there was no iconic decay, nor was there any significant short-term memory decay over a delay period of up to 7 sec. This almost perfect memory of the encoded value of a Gabor patch's contrast is indicated by both stable mean values of observers' responses (point of subjective equality) and by stable variances of their responses. Experimental procedures: A broad-bandwidth Gabor patch of contrast 0.42 (in HIGH context condition) or 0.62 (in LOW context condition) was displayed for 267 msec, followed by a second Gabor patch whose contrast was randomly chosen between 0.36 and 0.68 which was displayed after a variable delay between 0 and 7.3 sec. Observers judge whether patch 2 has higher or lower contrast than patch 1. The session mean contrast is 0.47 in HIGH sessions and 0.57 in LOW sessions.

Lin, L. Sperling, G. (2008). No iconic memory decay nor visual short-term memory decay for grating contrast [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):206, 206a, http://journalofvision.org/8/6/206/, doi:10.1167/8.6.206. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Research partially supported by Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Life Sciences, Grant FA9550-04-1-0225.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×